...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Current directions in psychological science: a journal of the American Psychological Society >Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study
【24h】

Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study

机译：元认知判断与控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Recent evidence indicates that people's judgments of their own learning are causally related to their study behavior and not epiphenomenal. I argue here that people use these metacognitions in an effort to selectively study material in their own region of proximal learning. First they attempt to eliminate materials that are already well learned. Then they progress successively from studying easier to more difficult materials. Successful implementation of this metacognitively guided strategy enhances learning. The necessary components are, first, that the metacognitions be accurate, and second, that the appropriate choices are implemented for study. With these parts in place, the individual is in position to effectively take control of his or her own learning.
机译：最近的证据表明，人们对自己学习的判断与他们的学习行为而不是癫痫症的判断。 我在这里争辩说，人们在努力中使用这些元记高，以便在自己的近端学习区域中选择性地学习材料。 首先，他们试图消除已经了解的材料。 然后他们连续进步，从学习更容易到更困难的材料。 成功实施这种元认知战略增强了学习。 The necessary components are, first, that the metacognitions be accurate, and second, that the appropriate choices are implemented for study. 通过这些部分到位，个人能够有效地控制他或她自己的学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号