...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>AACE International Transactions >Of Quantum Shades of Gray - A Dilemma for the Expert Witness
【24h】

Of Quantum Shades of Gray - A Dilemma for the Expert Witness

机译：灰色量子色调 - 专家证人的困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Testifying as an expert witness involves resolving many conflicts, both external and internal. This paper discusses one of the internal conflicts. Conveying objectivity is paramount to maintaining credibility with lawyers, judges and other decision makers. Arguments exist that there is often an implicit understanding between the hiring client and the expert that the expert will find a way to leverage the client's strong positions, and minimize or negate the weaker ones. Consequently, the expert is often caught in an internal conflict between performing objectively on one hand and meeting the client's expectations on the other. When does an expert cross the line (assuming it exists) from 'objectivity' into unwarranted advocacy? This paper presents one paradigm in effectively dealing with this conflict in a way that allows the practitioner to stay true to the AACE Canon of Ethics.
机译：作为专家证人作证涉及解决外部和内部的许多冲突。 本文讨论了其中一个内部冲突。 传达客观性至关重要，以保持与律师，法官和其他决策者的可信度。 存在论据，招聘客户之间通常有隐含的理解，专家能够找到一种方法来利用客户的强大立场，并尽量减少或否定较弱的人。 因此，专家往往陷入了一方面履行的内部冲突，并满足客户对另一方的期望。 什么时候专家交叉线（假设它存在）从“客观性”中的“目标”中的宣传宣传？ 本文提出了一个可有效处理这一冲突的范式，以便允许从业者留在伦理的AACE Canon的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号