• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges >The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework
【24h】

The Distinctions Between Theory, Theoretical Framework, and Conceptual Framework

机译：理论，理论框架和概念框架之间的区别

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Health professions education (HPE) researchers are regularly asked to articulate their use of theory, theoretical frameworks, and conceptual frameworks in their research. However, all too often, these words are used interchangeably or without a clear understanding of the differences between these concepts. Further problematizing this situation is the fact that theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework are terms that are used in different ways in different research approaches. In this article, the authors set out to clarify the meaning of these terms and to describe how they are used in 2 approaches to research commonly used in HPE: the objectivist deductive approach (from theory to data) and the subjectivist inductive approach (from data to theory). In addition to this, given that within subjectivist inductive research theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework can be used in different ways, they describe 3 uses that HPE researchers frequently rely on: fully inductive theory development, fully theory-informed inductive, and theory-informing inductive data analysis.
机译：健康专业教育（HPE）研究人员经常要求阐明他们在研究中使用理论，理论框架和概念框架。然而，总的来说，这些词语互换或不明确了解这些概念之间的差异。进一步存在这种情况是理论，理论框架和概念框架是在不同研究方法中以不同方式使用的术语。在本文中，作者提出了澄清这些术语的含义，并描述如何在HPE常用的研究方法中使用2种方法：客观主义演绎方法（从理论到数据）和主体归纳方法（来自数据理论上）。除此之外，鉴于在主观主义的归纳研究理论中，理论框架和概念框架中可以以不同的方式使用，他们描述了3个用途的HPE研究人员经常依赖：完全归纳理论的发展，完全理论上信息的归纳和理论 - 形式的归纳数据分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号