• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Academic psychiatry: the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry >After Hours: A Survey of Moonlighting Practices in Psychiatry Residents
【24h】

After Hours: A Survey of Moonlighting Practices in Psychiatry Residents

机译：余数：精神病学居民的灯光实践调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ObjectiveThe authors surveyed psychiatry residents to determine who participates in moonlighting and to understand their views and opinions on the necessity, importance, and educational value of moonlighting.MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to psychiatry residents at 16 programs nationally. Descriptive characteristics were calculated. Logistic and linear regressions were performed to determine differences between those who moonlight and those who do not and to assess differences in measures of financial distress, quality of life, and work-life balance.ResultsA total of 173/624 (27.6%) residents participated. Within the subset allowed to moonlight, 50% (47/94) reported moonlighting during prior academic year, for an average of 17.48.6hoursh per month. Within those eligible to moonlight, there were no differences in perceived financial distress, quality of life, work-life balance, and confidence between residents who moonlighted and those who did not. Among moonlighters, 10.6% moonlighted overnight before working the next day, and only 68.1% included moonlighting when recording duty hours. 45% reported no supervision available while moonlighting.Conclusions In the study sample, 50% of psychiatry residents eligible to moonlight opted to do so. Though most programs have policies in place regarding moonlighting, programs may benefit from ensuring that residents are reporting moonlighting in duty hours and that supervision is available to those moonlighting.
机译：客观的作者调查了精神病学居民，以确定谁参与月光，了解云光的必要性，重要性和教育价值的观点和意见..在全国16个计划中分配给精神病学居民的精神病学居民。计算描述性特征。进行了物流和线性回归，以确定月光与否的人与人之间的差异，并没有评估财务困扰，生活质量和工作生活的措施的差异。居民共计173/624（27.6％）参加。在允许月光下的子集合中，50％（47/94）报道了在上一年期间的月光，平均每月17.48.6小时。在符合月光灯条件的人内，感知财务困扰，生活质量，工作生活平衡和居民的居民之间没有差异，而且象以来不停地居住。在月光之下，在第二天工作之前月光在一夜之间10.6％，并且在记录占空比时，只有68.1％包括月光。 45％的报告没有监督，而Moonlighting。研究样本中的结论，50％的精神病学居民有资格达到月光选择。虽然大多数计划都有关于月光的政策，但程序可能会受益于确保居民报告在占空比下的月亮，并且监管可供这些月光使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号