Decline to Review a Manuscript: Insight and Implications for AJR Reviewers, Authors, and Editorial Staff

Raniga Sameer B.

首页> 外文期刊>AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences >Decline to Review a Manuscript: Insight and Implications for AJR Reviewers, Authors, and Editorial Staff

【24h】

Decline to Review a Manuscript: Insight and Implications for AJR Reviewers, Authors, and Editorial Staff

机译：拒绝审查稿件：对AJR审稿人，作者和编辑人员的见解和影响

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVE. The objective of the study was to evaluate and categorize the decline-to-review response to a manuscript review invitation that would allow American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) editorial staff to improve the peer review process and to reduce manuscript turnaround time.

机译：客观的。该研究的目的是评估和分类对手稿审查邀请的拒绝审查答复，以允许美国克莱格学（AJR）编辑人员改善同行评审过程，并减少手稿周转时间。

著录项

来源
《AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences》 |2020年第4期|共4页
作者
Raniga Sameer B.;
展开▼
作者单位

Sultan Qaboos Univ Hosp Dept Radiol &

Mol Imaging POB 38 PC 123 Muscat Oman;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类放射医学;
关键词
decline to review; manuscript turnaround time; peer review;

机译：拒绝审查;手稿周转时间;同行评审;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Decline to Review a Manuscript: Insight and Implications for AJR Reviewers, Authors, and Editorial Staff [J] . Raniga Sameer B. AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences . 2020,第4期

机译：拒绝审查稿件：对AJR审稿人，作者和编辑人员的见解和影响
2. Peering Into Peer Review: AJR Neuroradiology Reviewers Discuss Their Approaches to Assessing a Manuscript [J] . Provenzale James M., Buch Karen, Filippi Christopher G., AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences . 2020,第1期

机译：对同行评审审查：AJR神经加理学评论者讨论他们评估稿件的方法
3. Lessons Learned From AJR Neuroradiology Manuscript Reviews: Informative Advice for Prospective Authors in All Fields of Radiology [J] . Provenzale James M. AJR: American Journal of Roentgenology : Including Diagnostic Radiology, Radiation Oncology, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography and Related Basic Sciences . 2020,第1期

机译：从AJR神经加理学手稿中学到的经验教训评价：所有放射学领域的未来作者的信息咨询
4. RATE: A Review of Reviewers in a Manuscript Review Process [C] . IEEE/WIC/ACM Joint International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology . 2008

机译：评分：在手稿审查过程中对审核人员的评论
5. Editors’ Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development [O] . Kristin K. Janke, Andrew S. Bzowyckyj, Andrew P. Traynor 2017

机译：编辑对通过同行评审和审稿人开发提高稿件质量和编辑决策的观点
6. The Framingham Offspring Study: a commentary1150th AnniversaryHistorical ArticleINTRODUCTIONIn this edition of the Journal, we release the fifth in a series of reviews of influential articles that have been previously published in ACC journals, including the American Journal of Cardiology(from 1958 to 1982) and JACC(from 1983 to the present). The publication of these articles is only one aspect of the ACC’s 50th anniversary commemoration, which highlights 50 years of leadership in cardiovascular care and education. The articles are intended to encourage reflection on the remarkable progress made in cardiovascular medicine over time, as well as to acknowledge the amazing prescience of some early investigators in anticipating and, in many cases, later guiding developments in their field.The working group responsible for selecting these articles and asking reviewers to write editorials solicited suggestions from the ACC’s clinical committees and individual members.The group achieved consensus fairly easily, including whom the group should ask to prepare the accompanying editorials. We initially drew up a list of 14 general areas to cover in this series, but later found that there are several major areas of modern cardiology, prominently molecular cardiology, in which the truly landmark articles have, alas, not yet been published in JACC. Therefore, the working group decided not to categorize by subject, but instead, to concentrate on the most important articles.The working group, a task force of the Subcommittee for the Commemoration of the ACC 50th Anniversary, owes a great deal to Ms. May A. Roustom and the efficient and tireless staff at Heart House for facilitating this project. We also wish to thank all who suggested articles and, most important, the authors who prepared reviews for their willingness to contribute their time and wisdom.Influential Articles in JACC Working GroupSharon A. Hunt, M.D., F.A.C.C.Rick A. Nishimura, M.D., F.A.C.C.H.J.C. Swan, M.D., Ph.D., M.A.C.C.Michael J. Wolk, M.D., F.A.C.C. [O] . Swan H.J.C 1999

机译：弗雷明汉后代研究：1150周年历史文章引言在本期杂志中，我们发布了一系列有影响力的文章的第五篇评论，这些评论先前已在ACC期刊上发表，包括《美国心脏病学杂志》（1958年至1982年）和《美国心脏病学会杂志》（从1983年至今）。这些文章的发表只是ACC成立50周年纪念的一个方面，该纪念日着重介绍了心血管护理和教育领域50年的领导地位。这些文章旨在鼓励人们对心血管医学随着时间的推移所取得的显着进展进行反思，并承认一些早期研究人员在预见并在许多情况下为他们领域的发展提供指导的惊人先见之明。选择这些文章并要求审稿人撰写社论，征求ACC临床委员会和个人成员的建议。该小组相当容易达成共识，包括该小组应要求谁准备随附的社论。我们最初拟出了本系列文章涵盖的14个常规领域的清单，但后来发现现代心脏病学有几个主要领域，主要是分子心脏病学，可惜的是，真正的具有里程碑意义的文章尚未在JACC上发表。因此，工作组决定不按主题进行分类，而是专注于最重要的文章。工作组是ACC成立50周年纪念小组委员会的一个工作组，在很大程度上要归功于梅女士。 A. Roustom和Heart House高效而孜孜不倦的员工为该项目提供了便利。我们还要感谢所有提出建议的文章，最重要的是感谢准备撰写评论以贡献自己的时间和智慧的作者.JACC工作组的有影响力的文章Sharon A. Swan，M.D.，Ph.D.，M.A.C.C. Michael J.Wolk，M.D.，F.A.C.C.

Decline to Review a Manuscript: Insight and Implications for AJR Reviewers, Authors, and Editorial Staff

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅