• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of International Law >Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)
【24h】

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan)

机译：Jadhav案（印度和巴基斯坦）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Jadhav Case (India v. Pakistan) concerned Pakistan's arrest, detention, conviction, and death sentence of Kulbhushan Sudhir Jadhav, asserted by India to be an Indian national, who had been convicted of engaging in acts of terrorism and espionage in Pakistan. This is the third dispute over the interpretation of Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) to come before the International Court of Justice (ICJ). In contrast to the Applicants in the previous consular rights cases, India sought relief that included the annulment of Jadhav's conviction in Pakistan, his release from custody, and his safe transfer to India. After unanimously finding it had jurisdiction, fifteen judges of the ICJ, with only Judge ad hoc Jillani dissenting, held on the merits that Pakistan had breached VCCR Article 36 by failing to inform Jadhav without delay of his rights under that provision; by failing to notify without delay the appropriate consular post of India in Pakistan of his detention; and by depriving India of its right to communicate with Jadhav, to visit him in detention, and arrange for his legal representation. In addition, the Court, with only Judge ad hoc Jillani dissenting, found that Pakistan is under an obligation to inform Jadhav of his rights without further delay and is obliged to provide Indian consular officers access to him. The Court further found that appropriate reparation required Pakistan to provide, by means of its own choosing, effective review and reconsideration of Jadhav's conviction and sentence to ensure that full weight is given to the effect of the violation of his rights. Finally, the ICJ, again with Judge ad hoc Jillani dissenting, declared that a continued stay of execution constituted an indispensable condition for the effective review and reconsideration of Jadhav's conviction and sentence.
机译：Jadhav案（印度诉巴基斯坦）有关巴基斯坦的逮捕，拘留，信念和死刑，被印度被认为是印度国家，被判犯有恐怖主义和间谍行为的印度国民。这是在国际法院（ICJ）的国际法院之前，这是对“维也纳驻领事关系公约”第36条（VCCR）的解释的第三个争议。与申请人相比，申请人在前领事馆权利案件中，印度寻求救济，其中包括在巴基斯坦释放的巴基斯坦的释放和他的安全转移到印度。一致地发现它有管辖权后，ICJ的十五名法官，只有临时jillani异议法官，举行了巴基斯坦在未经延迟他在该规定下拖延他的权利而违反了VCCR第36条的优点;通过未经延迟拘留巴基斯坦的印度适当领事职位而未经延迟通知;并通过剥夺印度与JADHAV沟通的权利，在拘留中访问他，并安排他的法律代表。此外，法院只有裁判于特设的吉尔那尼审判，发现巴基斯坦有义务告知Jadhav他的权利，没有进一步推迟，有义务为印度领事官员提供对他的访问。法院进一步发现，通过自己的选择，有效的审查和再次回顾JADHAV的定罪和判决，以确保侵犯他权利的效果，通过自己的选择，有效的审查和重新考虑，以确保违反其权利的影响。最后，ICJ再次与Ad Hoc Jillani异议的法官宣布，持续的执行持续留在有效审查和重新考虑Jadhav的定罪和判决的不可或缺的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号