...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American Anthropologist >Anthropologists in Unexpected Places: Tracing Anthropological Theory, Practice, and Policy in Indians at Work
【24h】

Anthropologists in Unexpected Places: Tracing Anthropological Theory, Practice, and Policy in Indians at Work

机译：在意外的地方人类学家：追查人类学理论，实践和印度人的政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

During the 1930s, anthropologists were frequent contributors to the periodical, Indians at Work, published by the Office of Indian Affairs (OIA). While the magazine's primary purpose was to chronicle American Indian participation in federal relief programs, it also served as a larger forum for publishing and reprinting ethnographic works authored by anthropologists about American Indian communities. As such, it was a key site for mid-twentieth-century disciplinary debates, particularly in regard to establishing the subfield of applied anthropology. The varied contributions expose differences regarding the purpose and goals of the discipline as well as growing tensions between anthropologists and the OIA about the application of disciplinary knowledge to governmental policy. These struggles reveal the difficulty anthropologists had in locating contemporary American Indian communities within the larger US nation-state. Critically, the magazine also provided a space for tribal members as well as Indigenous anthropologists to engage in debates regarding ethnographic (mis)representation.
机译：在20世纪30年代，人类学家是印度事务办公室（OIA）出版的工作中的期刊印度人的经常贡献者。虽然该杂志的主要目的是纪闻美洲印第安人参与联邦救济计划，但它还担任了一个较大的出版和转载了人类学家关于美国印度社区的人类学家撰写的民族造型论坛。因此，它是二十世纪中期纪律辩论的关键网站，特别是在建立所申请人类学的子领域。各种各样的贡献揭示了纪律的目的和目标的差异，以及人类学家和OIA之间的紧张局势与纪律知识应用于政府政策。这些斗争揭示了人类学家在大美民族州内定位当代美洲印第安社区。批判性地，该杂志还为部落成员以及土着人类学家的空间提供了有关民族造影（MIS）代表的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号