...
首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia: Journal of the Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland >Comparison of closed vs open marking systems in the primary FRCA viva course at Coventry
【24h】

Comparison of closed vs open marking systems in the primary FRCA viva course at Coventry

机译:COVENTRY主要FRCA VIVA课程中封闭式VS开放标记系统的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Royal College of Anaesthetists recently introduced an open marking system for evaluation of candidates taking the fellowship examinations [1]. It is meant to reduce the examiner bias associated with a closed marking system. We evaluated the equivalent scores between open and closed marking during the structured oral examination (SOE) among candidates attending the Primary FRCA SOE course at Coventry in December 2009.
机译:皇家麻醉师学院最近推出了一个开放标记系统,用于评估候选人,以获取团契检查[1]。 它意味着减少与闭合标记系统相关的审查员偏置。 我们在2009年12月在考文垂的候选人中,在构建的口腔检查(SOE)之间的开放和闭合标记之间评估了相当的分数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号