• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of physiology and pharmacology >Adding Value to Multiple Choice Questions Banking An AIIMS Patna Experience
【24h】

Adding Value to Multiple Choice Questions Banking An AIIMS Patna Experience

机译：向多个选择问题添加价值银行AIIMS Patna体验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This is an era of objectivity and Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) are increasingly being used in evaluation of students in exams in educational institutions. Item analysis enables identifying good MCQs based on difficulty index (DIF I), discrimination index (Dl), Point biserial correlation (corrected) and distracter efficiency (DE). Present study has been undertaken with an objective to evaluate MCQs (items) and develop a pool of valid items and also to revise/store or discard items based on obtained results. After 3 months of dedicated teaching 67 out of total 67 students of 1st MBBS, AIIMS Patna appeared in first terminal examination of Physiology. It comprised of 30 "single response type" MCQs. Each correct response was awarded 1 marks and each incorrect response was awarded 0, range of score being 0-30. One group consisting of higher marks was considered as higher ability (H) and other group consisting of lower marks was considered as lower ability (L) group. Out of 67 students, 18 were in H groups and 18 in L group; rests (31) were in middle group and not considered in the study. Total 30 MCQs and 90 distracters were analyzed and based on this data, various indices like difficulty index, discrimination index, distracter efficiency and non functional distracters were calculated. Score of 67 students ranged from 7 to 26 (out of 30). Out of 30 items, 11 had "good to excellent" level or difficulty (DIF I = 31- 60%) and 20 had "good to excellent" discrimination power (Dl > 0.20). Nineteen questions were selected for question bank, four discarded and rest were modified and will be given for next batch and then again will be analysed.
机译：这是客观性的时代和多项选择题（MCQ）越来越多地用于评估教育机构考试中的学生。项目分析可以基于难度索引（DIF I），识别指数（DL），点双重相关（校正）和干扰效率（DE）来识别良好的MCQS。目前的研究已经进行了目的，以评估MCQS（物品），并开发一款有效物品池，并根据获得的结果修改/商店或丢弃物品。经过3个月的专用教学67总数为67名学生的第1 MBBS，AIIMS Patna出现在生理学的第一末终端检查中。它由30个“单响应类型”MCQs组成。每个正确的响应都被授予1个标记，并且每个错误的响应被授予0，分数范围为0-30。由较高标记组成的一组被认为是更高的能力（H），其它组由较低标记组成的组被认为是低能力（L）组。在67名学生中，18名是H组，18岁;休息（31）在中间组，在研究中不考虑。分析了30个MCQ和90个干扰因素，并根据该数据，计算了难度指数，歧视指数，干扰效率和非功能性干扰等各种指标。 67名学生的得分范围从7到26（满分30分）。在30项中，11个“良好的优秀”水平或难度（DIF I = 31-60％）和20有“良好的”良好“歧视功率（DL> 0.20）。选择银行的十九个问题，修改了四次丢弃和休息，并将提供下一个批次，然后再次分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号