...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Comparative study between biologic plating and intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures: Is biologic plating using LCP-DF superior to intramedullary nailing?
【24h】

Comparative study between biologic plating and intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures: Is biologic plating using LCP-DF superior to intramedullary nailing?

机译：生物电镀与髓内钉治疗子系统骨折的比较研究：使用LCP-DF优于髓内钉的生物镀层。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Background The objective of this study is to evaluate the outcome measures of subtrochanteric fractures between biologic plating and intramedullary nailing and determine if biologic plating is superior to intramedullary nailing. Methods Between March 2009 and December 2015, 81 patients with subtrochanteric fractures were enrolled (52 males and 29 females; 31 treated with biologic plating and 50 with intramedullary nailing). Biologic plating was conducted consecutively between May 2011 and March 2013 and intramedullary nailing was performed for the rest of period. Perioperative outcomes including operation time and blood loss during the operation; postoperative radiologic outcomes including union, time to union, coronal alignment, and shortening of the femur; and clinical outcomes including walking ability and pain were evaluated. The biologic plating group was compared with the intramedullary nailing group as a historical control. Results No significant differences were identified for bony union and time to union between the two different fixation methods Coronal alignment was significantly better in the biologic plating group than in the intramedullary nailing group (p Conclusion Surgical outcomes using LCP-DF are comparable to those using intramedullary nailing. Further clinical studies with a larger sample size are required to show the advantage of biologic plating for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. ]]>
机译：摘要背景本研究的目的是评估生物电镀和髓内钉在生物电镀和髓内钉之间的子系统骨折的结果测量，并确定生物电镀是否优于髓内钉。方法2009年3月和2015年12月，81例患有子系统转子骨折的患者（52名男性和29名女性; 31用生物镀层处理，50例用髓内钉治疗）。生物电镀在2011年5月至2013年5月至2013年3月之间进行，并且在其余时间内进行髓内钉。围手术期结果，包括操作期间的操作时间和失血;术后放射学结果包括联盟，联盟的时间，冠状对齐和股骨缩短;并评估包括步行能力和疼痛的临床结果。将生物电镀组与髓内钉组组进行比较，作为历史控制。结果对于骨髓联盟和联盟之间的时间没有识别显着差异，在两种不同的固定方法之间的时间在生物电镀组中显着更好地比在髓内钉组中显着更好（使用LCP-DF的外科手术结果与使用髓内闭合钉子。需要更大的样品尺寸的进一步临床研究来展示生物电镀用于治疗子系统骨折的优点。]>

著录项

  • 来源
    《Injury》 |2017年第10期|共7页
  • 作者

    Won Chul Shin; Nam Hoon Moon; Jae Hoon Jang; Hee Jin Lee; Kuen Tak Suh;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital Pusan National;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Bio)Medical Research Institute Pusan National University;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Bio)Medical Research Institute Pusan National University;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (Bio)Medical Research Institute Pusan National University;

    Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital Pusan National;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 创伤外科学;
  • 关键词

    Subtrochanteric fractures; Biologic plating; Intramedullary nailing;

    机译：脱叶型骨折;生物电镀;髓内钉;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号