...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' background, controversial issues, and the media
【24h】

Survey of expert opinion on intelligence: Intelligence research, experts' background, controversial issues, and the media

机译：智力专家意见调查：情报研究，专家背景，争议问题和媒体

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Experts (N-max = 102 answering) on intelligence completed a survey about IQ research, controversies, and the media. The survey was conducted in 2013 and 2014 using the Internet-based Expert Questionnaire on Cognitive Ability (EQCA). In the current study, we examined the background of the experts (e.g., nationality, gender, religion, and political orientation) and their positions on intelligence research, controversial issues, and the media. Most experts were male (83%) and from Western countries (90%). Political affiliations ranged from the left (liberal, 54%) to the right (conservative, 24%), with more extreme responses within the left-liberal spectrum. Experts rated the media and public debates as far below adequate. Experts with a left (liberal, progressive) political orientation were more likely to have positive views of the media (around r = vertical bar.30 vertical bar). In contrast, compared to female and left (liberal) experts, male and right (conservative) experts were more likely to endorse the validity of IQ testing (correlations with gender, politics: r = .55, .41), the g factor theory of intelligence (r = .18, .34), and the impact of genes on US Black-White differences (r = .50, .48). The paper compares the results to those of prior expert surveys and discusses the role of experts' backgrounds, with a focus on political orientation and gender. An underrepresentation of viewpoints associated with experts' background characteristics (i.e., political views, gender) may distort research findings and should be addressed in higher education policy.
机译：专家（N-MAX = 102答复）对情报完成了关于IQ研究，争议和媒体的调查。该调查是在2013年和2014年使用基于互联网的专家调查问卷进行了认知能力（EQCA）。在目前的研究中，我们研究了专家的背景（例如，国籍，性别，宗教和政治定位）及其对情报研究，有争议问题和媒体的职位。大多数专家都是男性（83％）和西方国家（90％）。政治附属机构从左右（自由，54％）到右侧（保守，24％），在左自由谱内具有更极端的回应。专家向媒体和公开辩论评定到低于足够的媒体和公开辩论。左（自由主义，逐步）政治取向的专家更有可能对媒体的积极观点（R =垂直条垂直栏垂直条）。相比之下，与女性和左（自由主义）专家相比，男性和权利（保守的）专家更有可能支持智商测试的有效性（与性别，政治相关性：R = .55，.41），G因子理论智力（r = .18，.34），以及基因对美国的黑白差异的影响（r = .50，.48）。本文将结果与先前的专家调查结果进行了比较，并讨论了专家背景的作用，重点关注政治定位和性别。与专家背景特征有关的观点（即，政治观点，性别）可能扭曲研究结果，并应在高等教育政策中解决观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号