...
首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >A comparison of hedonic and emotional responses to common odors delivered by qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices) and traditional sniff jars
【24h】

A comparison of hedonic and emotional responses to common odors delivered by qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices) and traditional sniff jars

机译:QPODS(便携式嗅觉装置)和传统嗅罐交付的常规气味的蜂窝和情绪反应的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

qPODs (Portable Olfactive Devices, Curion) are novel olfactory delivery systems which allow for sampling of a wide variety of stimulus types. Participants evaluate odors by opening a port at the top of the qPOD and sampling a controlled air stream. Though they are often used in marketing studies, their potential use in empirical research has yet to be investigated. We asked participants to smell citral, citronellol, geraniol, PEA, nonalactone, and vanillin delivered via qPODs and by traditional sniff jars, and compared both hedonic and emotional responses. Across four sessions, 31 participants evaluated the pleasantness and intensity of each odor in qPODs and sniff jars. Their emotional reactions to the odors were captured with the PANAS (Positive And Negative Affect Schedule) at the beginning of each testing session, and then again after exposure to each odor. They also completed the newly developed Mood Signature Questionnaire, which asks participants to assign a mood to each odor, rather than reporting how it makes them feel. Though odors presented in the sniff jars were rated significantly more intense (p < 0.001), there were no differences between presentation types for perceived pleasantness, changes in positive or negative mood following odor exposure, or which emotional descriptors (Mood Signatures) participants assigned to the odors. Our results suggest that responses to odor stimuli presented using qPODs are comparable to traditional sniff jars, thus establishing the qPOD as a potential new tool for studies employing a range of olfactory stimuli.
机译:QPODS(便携式嗅觉装置,橘子)是新型嗅觉递送系统,其允许采样各种刺激类型。参与者通过在QPOD顶部打开一个端口来评估气味并采样受控空气流。虽然它们经常用于营销研究,但他们在实证研究中的潜在用途尚未调查。我们要求参与者通过QPOD和传统的嗅瓶子和传统的嗅瓶,并将夏季和情绪反应相比,味道柠檬酸葡萄球菌,香核糖醇,豌豆,豌豆,壬烯醇和香草醇,豌豆,非粘土和香草醇。在四个会议上,31名参与者评估了QPODS和嗅罐中每种气味的愉快和强度。他们对气味的情绪反应被每次测试会话开始时用Panas(正面和负面影响计划)捕获,然后在暴露于每种气味后再次。他们还完成了新开发的情绪签名调查问卷,要求参与者为每种气味分配心情,而不是报告它是如何让他们感受到的。虽然嗅觉罐子里的气味被评为显着更强烈(p <0.001),但感知愉快的呈现类型之间没有差异,在气味暴露后的积极或负面情绪的变化,或者将参与者(情绪签名)分配给气味。我们的研究结果表明,使用QPOD呈现的对气味刺激的反应与传统的嗅觉罐相当,因此将QPOD作为采用一系列嗅觉刺激的研究建立QPOD。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号