• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND RESPONSIBILITY-SHARING TO PROTECT REFUGEES: WHAT, WHY AND HOW?
【24h】

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND RESPONSIBILITY-SHARING TO PROTECT REFUGEES: WHAT, WHY AND HOW?

机译：国际合作与责任分享保护难民：什么，为什么和如何？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

While countries that receive refugees have certain legal obligations to assist and protect them, the legal duties of other States to step in and help relieve this burden is less clear. Despite multiple proposals, a mechanism to systematically, equitably and predictably allocate responsibilities between States at a global level has still not been agreed. The UN's High-Level Summit on Addressing Large Movements of Refugees on 19 September 2016 held some promise in this regard, but the resulting New York Declaration was more muted than earlier drafts. This article seeks to provide a unique insight into the meaning of responsibility-sharing and international cooperation from the perspective of individual States. It does so by examining statements they have made at various UN fora over the past decade. It focuses on the two main methods of sharing responsibilities, namely the provision of financial and other assistance to host countries, and the admission of refugees. It then considers the extent to which States perceive responsibility-sharing to be a legal obligation, as opposed to a voluntary undertaking, and analyses this in light of expert opinion. Finally, it discusses the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, a concept drawn from international environmental law, and considers whether and how it might apply in the international refugee law context.
机译：虽然接受难民的国家有一定的法律义务来协助和保护他们，但其他国家的法律责任进一步并帮助减轻这种负担的不太明确。尽管有多项建议，但在全球范围内系统，公平地和可预测地分配国家之间的机制仍未达成一致。联合国在2016年9月19日在这方面解决了大量难民的高级峰会，但在这方面举行了一些承诺，但由此产生的纽约宣言比早期的草稿更柔和。本文旨在从个别国家的角度提供符合责任分享和国际合作意义的独特洞察。通过审查过去十年，他们在各种联合国举行的陈述进行了审查。它专注于分享责任的两种主要方法，即提供对东道国的财务和其他援助以及难民的录取。然后，它考虑了各国认为，责任分享是法律义务，而不是自愿事业，并根据专家意见分析这一点。最后，它讨论了普通但有区别的责任的原则，这是一种从国际环境法中汲取的概念，并考虑其在国际难民法范围内是否适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号