...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management >Lean Six Sigma for small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a systematic review
【24h】

Lean Six Sigma for small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a systematic review

机译：精益六西格玛用于中型和中型制造企业：系统审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the most common themes within Lean Six Sigma (LSS)relating to small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) within manufacturing organisations and to identifythe research gaps in the existing literature.Design/methodology/approach - Tranfield et al's (2003) systematic review methodology was utilisedencompassing three stages: planning, conducting and reporting/dissemination.Findings - The literature revealed that there are many areas in which LSS has been utilised with varyingsuccesses. In total, 52 journals have been reviewed and it has been concluded that although LSS is a powerfulmethodology, there are many gaps that exist in the literature and further research is needed to address thesein the field of LSS.Research limitations/implications - The papers included in the systematic review were peer-reviewedpapers available in English. Due to these limitations, relevant papers may have been excluded. Moreover, theauthors have excluded all conference and white papers for their inclusion in this study.Practical implications - It is vital that LSS practitioners are fully aware of the benefits, limitations andimpeding factors when implementing a LSS initiative. Therefore, this paper could provide valuable insights toensuring maximum value, is obtained from LSS implementation in SMEs.Originality/value - This systematic review identifies research gaps in the current literature and highlightingareas of future research which will be beneficial to many SMEs in their pursuit of value optimisation.
机译：目的 - 本文的目的是探讨在制造组织内的小型和中型企业（中小企业）和识别现有文学中的研究差距.Design/Methodology/的贫民六西格玛（LSS）中最常见的主题。方法 - Tranfield等人（2003）系统审查方法正在利用三个阶段：规划，进行和报告/传播.Findings - 文献透露，LSS已被各种范围内使用了许多领域。总共审查了52个期刊，并且已经得出结论认为，尽管LSS是一种强大的方法，但文献中存在许多存在的差距，需要进一步研究，以解决LSS.Research限制/影响的领域 - 包括在内在系统审查中，审核纸是审查的英语。由于这些限制，可能已被排除在外的相关文件。此外，散步者排除了所有会议和白皮书，因为他们将其列入本研究。实践意义 - LSS从业人员完全了解了实施LSS倡议时充分了解福利，限制令人瞩目的因素至关重要。因此，本文可以提供有价值的见解，从中小企业的LSS实施获得了最大值。价值优化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号