...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of technology and design education >Models as artefacts of a dual nature: a philosophical contribution to teaching about models designed and used in engineering practice
【24h】

Models as artefacts of a dual nature: a philosophical contribution to teaching about models designed and used in engineering practice

机译:模型作为双重性的人工制品:对设计和用于工程实践的模型教学的哲学贡献

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although 'models' play a significant role in engineering activities, not much has yet been developed to enhance the technological literacy of students in this regard. This contribution intends to help fill this gap and deliver a comprehensive account as to the nature and various properties of these engineering tools. It begins by inspecting two well-known cases: the long-term policy documents of technological literacy in the USA and in New Zealand. This will help to clarify the approach of these educational documents to models, provide a primary understanding of their existing drawbacks in this relation, and realize the necessity of underpinning a well-organized account that can be used in teaching about models. Next, the discussion moves toward an attempt to develop a sound description of the nature of models. This is accomplished through an extensive review of the viewpoints of philosophers (of science and technology) about the nature and properties of these tools; models will then be argued and suggested for consideration as techno-scientific artefacts with their own dual nature: the intrinsic and the intentional. Such an account paves the way to the next step, which namely attempts to provide a well-ordered framework of the models' various properties, through taking up those two natures and their interrelation in detail. The paper concludes by showing some initial advantages of applying the suggested approach to the intended cases, which can hopefully lead to further, more detailed inspections and extended contributions.
机译:虽然“模特”在工程活动中发挥着重要作用,但并不多大程度上已经开发出来,以提高学生的技术识字。这一贡献打算帮助填补这一差距,并提供全面的账户,以满足这些工程工具的性质和各种性质。它始于检查两个着名的案例:美国和新西兰技术素养的长期政策文件。这将有助于澄清这些教育文件对模型的方法,提供对这一关系中现有缺点的主要理解,并实现了支撑良好组织账户的必要性,这些账户可用于教学教学。接下来,讨论旨在尝试制定对模型性质的声音描述。这是通过对哲学家(科学和技术)关于这些工具的性质和性质的广泛审查来实现的;然后将争论模型,并建议考虑到他们自己的双重性:内在和故意的技术科学的人工制品。这样的账户铺平了下一步的方式,即尝试提供模型的各种属性的良好框架,通过占据这两个性质及其相互关系。本文通过展示将建议的方法应用于预期案件的一些初步优势来结束,这些案件可以有望导致进一步,更详细的检查和延长捐款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号