...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >The knowledge protection paradox: imitation and innovation through knowledge sharing
【24h】

The knowledge protection paradox: imitation and innovation through knowledge sharing

机译：知识保护悖论：通过知识共享模仿和创新

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Western multinational corporations (MNCs) that want market access in China have to share knowledge with Chinese partners. This may expose them to imitation, so MNCs prefer to protect knowledge resulting in a strategic paradox: MNCs have to both share and protect knowledge. To analyse this paradox, we developed a theoretical conceptual model capturing the tensions and feedback cycles of this paradox. Next, based on data from the shipbuilding industry, a system dynamics model was developed to simulate the long-term effects of sharing and protecting strategies. The results indicate that protection is detrimental to long-term success, because it undercuts the trust of the Chinese supplier and irreparably reduces innovation rates. Knowledge protection thus reduces instead of increases the ability to share (new) knowledge in the future. A sharing strategy increases imitation, but also trust and knowledge sharing by the Chinese partner, such that it enhances the MNC's innovation rate and long-term performance.
机译：希望在中国的市场访问的西方跨国公司（MNC）必须与中国合作伙伴分享知识。这可能会使它们造成模仿，因此MNCs更愿意保护导致战略悖论的知识：MNC必须共享和保护知识。为了分析这一悖论，我们开发了一个理论概念模型，捕获了该悖论的紧张局势和反馈周期。接下来，基于来自造船业的数据，开发了一个系统动态模型，以模拟共享和保护策略的长期影响。结果表明，保护对长期成功不利，因为它削弱了中国供应商的信任，而无法弥补创新率。因此，知识保护减少而不是提高未来分享（新）知识的能力。分享策略增加了模仿，也增加了中国合作伙伴的信任和知识分享，使得它提高了MNC的创新率和长期绩效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号