...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BJOG: an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology >Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future
【24h】

Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression: facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future

机译：神经性镇痛对分娩进展的影响：事实，谬论，不确定性和未来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Approximately 60% of women who labour in the USA receive some form of neuraxial analgesia, but concerns have been raised regarding whether it negatively impacts the labour and delivery process. In this review, we attempt to clarify what has been established as truths, falsities and uncertainties regarding the effects of this form of pain relief on labour progression, negative and/or positive. Additionally, although the term ` epidural' has become synonymous with neuraxial analgesia, we discuss two other techniques, combined spinal-epidural and continuous spinal analgesia, that are gaining popularity, as well as their effects on labour progression.
机译：在美国，大约60％的劳动妇女接受某种形式的神经痛镇痛，但是人们担心这种镇痛是否会对劳动和分娩过程产生负面影响。在这篇综述中，我们试图澄清关于这种形式的缓解疼痛对劳动进展（消极和/或积极）的影响的事实，虚假和不确定性。此外，尽管“硬膜外”一词已成为神经痛镇痛的代名词，但我们讨论了另外两种技术，即脊柱硬膜外和连续性脊柱镇痛，它们正在普及，并且它们对分娩进展产生了影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号