...
首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >SAVING PRIVATE ISDS: THE CASE FOR HARDENING ETHICAL GUIDELINES AND SYSTEMATIZING CONFLICTS CHECKS
【24h】

SAVING PRIVATE ISDS: THE CASE FOR HARDENING ETHICAL GUIDELINES AND SYSTEMATIZING CONFLICTS CHECKS

机译:保存私人ISDS:硬化道德准则和系统化冲突检查的情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The European Union (EU) has declared its dissatisfaction with investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) and its intention to replace it with an investment court system. Other states have expressed concerns over the transparency of ISDS and have withdrawn or failed to renew their bilateral investment treaties. Two of the major ISDS conventions, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), are reviewing proposals for reform. Because arbitrator bias is one of the few ways that an award can be challenged, this Note proposes reforms in the selection and appointment of arbitral tribunals.
机译:欧洲联盟(欧盟)宣布对投资者国家争端解决(ISDS)的不满及其与投资法院制度取代它的意图。 其他国家对ISDS的透明度表示关切,并撤回或未能续订双边投资条约。 两位主要的ISDS惯例是,国际集团的投资纠纷(ICSID)和联合国国际贸易法委员会(贸易法委员会)正在审查改革建议。 由于仲裁员偏见是奖励可能受到挑战的几种方式之一,因此本说明提出了仲裁庭的选择和任用的改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号