• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Foundations of Physics: An International Journal Devoted to the Conceptual Bases and Fundamental Theories of Modern Physics, Biophysics & Cosmology >The Practice of Naturalness: A Historical-Philosophical Perspective
【24h】

The Practice of Naturalness: A Historical-Philosophical Perspective

机译：自然的实践：历史哲学的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

No evidence of "new physics" was found so far by LHC experiments, and this situation has led some voices in the physics community to call for the abandonment of the "naturalness" criterion, while other scientists have felt the need to break a lance in its defense by claiming that, at least in some sense, it has already led to successes and therefore should not be dismissed too quickly, but rather only reflected or reshaped to fit new needs. In our paper we will argue that present pro-or-contra naturalness debates miss the fundamental point that naturalness, despite contrary claims, is essentially a very hazily defined, in a sense even mythical notion which, in the course of more than four decades, has been steadily, and often not coherently, shaped by its interplay with different branches of model-building in high-energy physics and cosmology on the one side, and new incoming experimental results on the other. In our paper we will endeavor to clear up some of the physical and philosophical haze by taking a closer look back at (real or alleged) origin of naturalness in the 1970s and 1980s, with particular attention to the early work of Kenneth Wilson. In doing this, we aim to bring to light how naturalness belongs to a long tradition of present and past physical and philosophical criteria for effectively guiding theoretical reflection and experimental practice in fundamental research.
机译：除了LHC实验，没有发现“新物理学”的证据，这种情况导致了物理界的一些声音，要求放弃“自然”标准，而其他科学家则感受到需要打破矛盾的必要性通过声称，至少在某种意义上，它已经导致成功，因此不应该被解雇太快，而是仅被反映或重塑以适应新的需求。在我们的论文中，我们将争辩说，目前的亲自自然辩论错过了自然，尽管有恰当的声明，其基本上是一个非常危险的义，甚至是甚至神话的概念，在超过四十年的过程中，已经稳步，并且通常不会连贯，塑造了在一侧高能物理和宇宙中的模型建设的不同分支的相互作用，另一方面的新进入实验结果。在我们的论文中，我们将努力通过在20世纪70年代和20世纪80年代的自然的自然起源仔细研究，特别注意肯尼斯威尔逊的早期作品，清除一些身体和哲学雾峰。在这样做时，我们的目标是为了利用如何在基本研究中有效地指导理论反思和实验实践的现状和身体和哲学标准的漫长传统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号