...
首页> 外文期刊>ACSM’s health & fitness journal >Applying Econometric Evaluations in Health and Fitness Settings As programming impact expectations intensify in many tiealtti-fitness settings, basic econometric evaluation techniques can guide decision-makers in their strategic planning
【24h】

Applying Econometric Evaluations in Health and Fitness Settings As programming impact expectations intensify in many tiealtti-fitness settings, basic econometric evaluation techniques can guide decision-makers in their strategic planning

机译:在健康和体适能环境中应用计量经济学评估随着编程挑战预期在许多健康适应环境中的增长,基本计量经济学评估技术可以指导决策者进行战略规划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Is the online fitness programming as cost-effective as the weight management module? When will the new personal coaching program reach a favorable break-even point? Are regular fitness center participants really less likely to incur high medical care costs? Is the injury rehabilitation program generating a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio? When the programming budget tightens, which programs should we keep, put on hold, or eliminate? Do any of these questions sound familiar? As cost-justification demands increase in many health/fitness settings, more decision makers are turning to various econometric tools and techniques to direct their strategic planning efforts. Perhaps the most popular and user friendly econometric techniques found in health and fitness settings include break-even analysis (BEA), cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), and benefit-cost analysis (BCA) (1-11).
机译:在线健身计划是否与体重管理模块一样具有成本效益?新的个人教练计划何时才能达到有利的收支平衡点?定期参加健身中心的人真的不太可能承担高昂的医疗费用吗?伤害康复计划是否产生有利的成本效益比?当计划预算收紧时,我们应保留,保留或取消哪些计划?这些问题听起来是否熟悉?随着在许多健康/健身环境中成本合理化需求的增加,越来越多的决策者正在转向各种计量经济学工具和技术来指导其战略规划工作。在健康和健身环境中发现的最受欢迎和用户友好的计量经济学技术可能包括收支平衡分析(BEA),成本效益分析(CEA)和收益成本分析(BCA)(1-11)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号