...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine today >Automated office blood pressure readings as good as ambulatory readings
【24h】

Automated office blood pressure readings as good as ambulatory readings

机译：自动化办公室血压读数与动态读数一样好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) readings can be as accurate as awake ambulatory readings, and more accurate than office readings, new research suggests. A systematic review and meta-analysis, published in JAMA Internal Medicine, examined 31 studies involving 9279 participants that compared different methods of BP measurement. They showed that routine office systolic BP readings were on average 14.5mmHg higher than systolic AOBP readings in samples with automated readings of 130mmHg or more. However, there was no significant difference between systolic awake ambulatory BP readings and AOBP readings. The study suggested that BP measurements done under research conditions were also significantly higher than systolic AOBP readings.
机译：新研究表明，自动化办公室血压（AOBP）血压（AOBP）读数可以像清醒的动态读数一样准确，比办公室读数更准确。 在Jama Internal Medicine发表的系统审查和荟萃分析检查了31项涉及9279名参与者的研究，比较了不同的BP测量方法。 他们表明，常规办公室收缩额为14.5mmHg的读数高于样品中的收缩型AOBP读数，自动读数为130mmHg以上。 但是，收缩期醒来的动态BP读数和AOBP读数之间没有显着差异。 该研究表明，在研究条件下进行的BP测量也明显高于收缩期AOBP读数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号