...
首页> 外文期刊>Midirs midwifery digest >Does planned home birth for low-risk women have less intervention and fewer complications than planned hospital birth?
【24h】

Does planned home birth for low-risk women have less intervention and fewer complications than planned hospital birth?

机译:是否计划出于低风险女性的出生的干预较少,并发症比计划的医院出生更少?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A pregnant woman is defined as low risk when she is in good general health and has an uncomplicated medical and obstetric history (Bolten et at 2016). It is debatable that planned home birth may present fewer risks to uncomplicated pregnant women when compared to planned hospital birth (Scarf et al 2018). In the United Kingdom (UK), a pregnant woman has the right to choose her home as the place of birth for her child. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2019) states that 2.1% of women in England and Wales gave birth at home in 2017; a total of 14,621 women.Midwives, who also believe in the innate capability of women to birth their babies, see childbirth as a normal physiological phenomenon. Midwives should be able to inform and support a woman's decision to birth at home, endeavouring to conserve parturient and fetal health while providing safe, holistic, evidence-based care (Royal College of Midwives (RCM) 2008). The increased numbers of home births within the study area has highlighted the vital role of the midwife in the articulation of the advantages and disadvantages of available evidence surrounding this practice.
机译:当她良好的普遍健康状况时,孕妇被定义为低风险,并具有简单的医学和产科历史(2016年Bolten等)。与计划医院出生的出生相比在英国(英国),孕妇有权选择她的家作为她孩子的出生地。国家统计局(ONS)(2019年)(2019年)指出,英格兰和威尔士的2.1%的妇女在2017年在家里诞生;共有14,621名女性.Midwives也相信女性的天生能力,诞生婴儿,见分娩作为正常的生理现象。助产士应该能够为妇女在家里出生的决定,努力提供父母和胎儿健康,同时提供安全,整体,循证护理(俄罗斯皇家助理(RCM)2008)。研究领域内的家庭诞生数量增加突出了助产士在阐述了这种做法周围的可用证据的优缺点中的重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号