...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >New sophistry: self‐deception in the nursing academy
【24h】

New sophistry: self‐deception in the nursing academy

机译：新的诡辩：护理学院的自欺欺人

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract In this essay, I advance an argument against the expansion and acceptance of postmodern metaphysical antirealist ideologies in the development of nursing theory in North America. I suggest mystical theoretical explanations of care, the rejection of empirical epistemology, and a return to divinity in nursing represent an intellectual dead end, as these ideas do little to help resolve real‐world health issues and also negate the need for the academic discrimination of bad ideas. I examine some of the philosophical foundations of nursing theory and deconstruct some of the more preternatural theories that have become established as the dominant conventional wisdom in the academy. It is argued that this can be characterized as a form of self‐deception, and overall has had a negative impact on advancement of the nursing profession and public health care. Reasons behind the widespread acceptance of these irrational theoretical stances in nursing and the ongoing support for mystical therapeutic interventions are explored.
机译：摘要在这篇文章中，我推进了谈判在北美护理理论发展中的后现代形而上学反对前论主义意识形态的争论。我建议护理的神秘理论解释，拒绝经验认识论，以及护理中的神性回归神性代表着一个知识分子的结局，因为这些想法对帮助解决现实世界的健康问题并否定了对学术歧视的必要性糟糕的想法。我研究了护理理论的一些哲学基础，并解构了一些更具更具预测的理论，这些理论已经成为学院中的主要传统智慧。有人认为，这可以被称为自我欺骗的形式，而且整体对护理职业和公共卫生护理的进步产生了负面影响。探讨了护理中这些非理性理论立场的广泛接受的原因以及对神秘治疗干预措施的持续支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号