...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals >Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussion
【24h】

Research paradigms and the politics of nursing knowledge: A reflective discussion

机译：研究范式与护理知识政治：反思讨论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract A standard view would suggest that research is a neutral apolitical activity. It neutralizes external pressures by its fidelity to robust scientific methods. However, politics is an inevitable part of human knowledge. Our knowledge of the world is always mediated by human priorities. What matters is therefore a contested and political debate rather a neutral accumulation of factual data. How researchers manage this varies. Research paradigms are one way in which research engages with knowledge. They frame knowledge within epistemological and ontological philosophies. In this paper, I will explore this view in relation to neo‐positivism, qualitative research, Foucault and critical realism. I will argue that if nursing knowledge is to be effective it needs to acknowledge the political, particularly in the context of neoliberalism. Healthcare systems are having to cope with a social world increasingly dominated by market fundamentalism, extreme levels of inequality and a rise in xenophobia. These forces are undermining the provision of ethically sound health care, misdirecting research practice and contributing to a discourse of dehumanization. These forces need to be challenged politically and I will argue that epistemologically diverse approaches, alongside a realist ontology can provide a way forward for nursing research.
机译：摘要标准观点建议研究是中立的非政治活动。它通过富力充分利用强大的科学方法来中和外部压力。然而，政治是人类知识的不可避免的一部分。我们对世界的了解始终被人类优先事项调解。因此，重要的是一个有争议的和政治辩论，而是对事实数据的中立积累。研究人员如何管理这种变化。研究范式是研究与知识的一种方式。他们在认识论和本体论哲学中框架知识。在本文中，我将探讨这个看法，与新实证主义，定性研究，福柯和批判性质有关。我会争辩说，如果护理知识是有效的，它需要承认政治，特别是在新自由主义的背景下。医疗保健系统必须应对社会世界，越来越多地由市场原教旨主义，极端不平等水平和仇外心理崛起。这些力量正在破坏提供道德健康保健，误导研究实践和促进除去的话语。这些力量需要在政治上受到挑战，我将争辩说明思想过多样化的方法，以及现实主义本体可以提供前进的护理研究方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号