...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nursing forum >The use of “high‐stakes testing” in nursing education: Rhetoric or rigor?
【24h】

The use of “high‐stakes testing” in nursing education: Rhetoric or rigor?

机译：在护理教育中使用“高赌注测试”：修辞或严谨？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract The expectations for clinically ready graduates have increased over the years, paralleling changes in the NCLEX exam with increasingly cognitively difficult items in preparation for professional nursing practice. Yet, it is widely recognized that nursing program exit standardized exams have come under increased scrutiny in several public cases. Several articles have frequently been cited in the opposing argument against use of the HESI Exit Exam or other standardized nursing exit exams. We review two of these for logical coherence and standard psychometric adherence given their recurrent use in arguing against nursing program exit standardized testing. In light of patient safety implications and school accreditation consequences, it's more important that schools use exit standardized testing and assess minimum competency of students based on an exit program standardized exam. Measurement standards are critical to these analyses. The use of a program exit standardized exam also alerts students that faculty are holding them accountable for their time in the program.
机译：摘要临床就绪毕业生的期望多年来增加了云南查格考试的变化，越来越认知的难以准备专业护理实践。然而，众所周知，护理计划退出标准化考试在几个公共案件中受到审查的增加。对反对论证的几篇文章常见于利用HESI退出考试或其他标准化护理退出考试。我们审查其中两个用于逻辑一致性和标准的心理测量遵守，因为他们在争论争论护理计划退出标准化测试时进行复发使用。鉴于患者安全影响和学校认证后果，学校使用退出标准化测试更重要的是，基于退出计划标准化考试评估学生的最低能力。测量标准对这些分析至关重要。使用计划退出标准化考试还提醒学生将学院持有他们在该计划中的时间负责。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号