• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Putting nature 'to work' through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice
【24h】

Putting nature 'to work' through Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES): Tensions between autonomy, voluntary action and the political economy of agri-environmental practice

机译：通过对生态系统服务（PES）的付款来实现自然“工作”：自治，自愿行动与农业环境实践政治经济之间的紧张局势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the Canadian province of Prince Edward Island (PEI), producers have been financially incentivized over the past decade to halt soil erosion, improve water quality, and promote habitat for biodiversity through a provincial programme called "Alternative Land Use Services" (ALUS). ALUS is the first example of a provincial-wide application of payments for ecosystem services (PES) in Canada, yet few studies have explored the application of PES in a Canadian context. In this study, we consider the implementation and outcomes of land-use retirement for conservation within the political economy of intensive agriculture, and particularly the processing potato sector of PEI. Producers subscribing to the programme reported that a combination of financial incentive and moral imperatives for land-use protection influenced uptake; however, an underlying concern referred to rising annual costs of production and increasingly tighter margins of return. In this situation, producers have consistently stated that land taken out of production through PES incurs costs on the producer, eventually resulting in intensified production or the search for new land to replace lost yields. While PES itself may be altering behaviour on land-use management, producers have little control over the broader neoliberal market structures to which they belong. As such, we distinguish between "voluntary" participation in PES as embedded within an unsustainable and expansionary industrial agricultural model from the autonomy of farmers to regenerate the social and ecological potential of food production. In regards to regaining autonomy, we offer examples of how farmers collectively organize to negotiate new sets of incentives through mutual aid and risk-sharing within cooperative enterprises. These examples suggest a form of alter-PES that is being established in the shadow of the formal ALUS programme. We argue that PES should valorize individual and collective efforts towards land stewardship in resistance to the social and ecological simplifications of industrial agriculture.
机译：在加拿大省爱德华王子岛（PEI），生产者在过去十年中经济上激励，通过省级计划暂停土壤侵蚀，提高水质，促进生物多样性的栖息地，称为“替代土地使用服务”（ALUS）。 ALU是加拿大在加拿大的生态系统服务（PES）支付的省级国际支付的第一个例子，但很少有研究已经探索了PE在加拿大背景下的应用。在这项研究中，我们考虑了在集约化农业政治经济内保护的土地利用退休的实施和结果，特别是PEI的加工马铃薯部门。订阅该计划的制片人报告说，金融激励和道德要求的土地使用保护影响影响;然而，潜在的疑虑提到了产量上涨，越来越紧紧的回报边际。在这种情况下，生产者一直指出，通过PE所采取的土地遭受生产者的成本，最终导致生产的加强生产或寻找新土地以取代产量损失。虽然PES本身可能正在改变土地使用管理的行为，但生产者对他们所属的更广泛的新自由主义市场结构进行了控制。因此，我们区分了“自愿”参与PES，从农民自主权中嵌入到一个不可持续和扩张的工业农业模型中，从农民自主中重新制定食品生产的社会和生态潜力。关于恢复自主权，我们提供了农民如何通过合作企业中的互助和风险共享谈判新的农民谈判新的激励措施。这些示例提出了一种在正式ALUS计划的阴影中建立的Alter-PE的形式。我们认为，PE应该将个人和集体努力纳入抵抗工业农业的社会和生态简化的土地管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号