...
首页> 外文期刊>Library & Information Science Research >How academic librarians, IT staff, and research administrators perceive and relate to research
【24h】

How academic librarians, IT staff, and research administrators perceive and relate to research

机译:学术图书馆员,IT人员和研究管理员如何感知和涉及研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Academic libraries are changing how they support research. For example, their involvement in research data management (RDM) implies a much deeper relationship with researchers throughout the research lifecycle. Perhaps we are witnessing a shift from support to partnership. This study examines how librarians, IT staff, and research administrators see research and their own relation to it. Within an interpretative methodology, 20 semi structured interviews with librarians, IT staff, and research administrators were analyzed thematically. Librarians often talked about research via the discourse of research-led teaching. They also conceived of it via notions of collection and to a lesser extent through reference work or copyright expertise. They saw some of their own con-, tinuing professional development or service development work as akin to the work of university researchers, but at the other end of a spectrum. Some saw a categorical difference and considered that research was only conducted by people who had a job title of researcher. IT managers tended to see research via infrastructure or specialist expertise. However, at least one IT staff member saw himself as both partly a researcher and a bridge between research and support. Research administrators tended to see research through the roles of administrative support and policy influence. In summary, seven broad narratives about research were identified: influencing researchers to align with policy; being a researcher; being a bridge with research; offering expertise; providing infrastructure; supporting a research/teaching nexus; and relieving researchers of administrative burdens. As institutions develop research partnerships, e.g., around RDM, training and curricula will need to expand existing conceptions and build deeper empathetic relationships with research. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:学术图书馆正在改变他们如何支持研究。例如,他们参与研究数据管理(RDM)意味着与整个研究生命周期的研究人员的关系更深入。也许我们正在寻求从支持伙伴关系的转变。本研究介绍了图书馆员,IT人员和研究管理员如何看待研究和自己的关系。在解释方法中,主题地分析了与图书馆员,IT人员和研究管理员的20个半结构化访谈。图书馆员经常通过研究领导教学的话语讨论研究。他们还通过参考工作或版权专业知识通过收集概念和较小程度构思。他们看到了自己的一些,顽固的专业发展或服务开发工作,适用于大学研究人员的工作,但在频谱的另一端。有些人看到了一个分类差异,并认为研究只是由研究人员职称的人进行。 IT经理倾向于通过基础设施或专业专业知识来查看研究。但是,至少有一个IT工作人员认为自己是部分研究员和研究和支持之间的桥梁。研究管理人员倾向于通过行政支持和政策影响的作用来了解研究。总之,确定了关于研究的七个广阔叙述:影响研究人员与政策保持一致;作为一名研究人员;作为研究的桥梁;提供专业知识;提供基础设施;支持研究/教学Nexus;并缓解行政负担研究人员。随着机构制定研究伙伴关系,例如,在RDM周围,培训和课程需要扩大现有概念并与研究建立更深层次的同情关系。 (c)2016年Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号