...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Library & Information Science Research >Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations
【24h】

Toward collaborator selection and determination of data ownership and publication authorship in research collaborations

机译：对协作者选择和确定研究合作中的数据所有权和出版物作者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract This study examined factors that might affect researchers' willingness to collaborate with a specific researcher and the priorities given to those factors. In addition, it investigated how researchers determined the ownership of collaborative project data and how they determined the order of authorship on collaborative publications in condensed matter physics. In general, researchers rated their intrinsic motivations the highest, such as the quality of ideas a potential collaborator might have and their satisfaction with a past collaboration, followed by their extrinsic motivations, such as the complementary knowledge, skills, or resources the collaborator could provide. In addition, researchers who had a greater number of collaborative projects and researchers who had served as a project PI or co-PI valued the deep-level, personality-related characteristics of a collaborator higher than did those who had not. Younger researchers were more risk averse and more concerned with a collaborator's reputation and the possible cost of a collaboration decision. Additionally, younger researchers indicated more often than older researchers that they did not know whether their project teams followed any rules or norms or engaged in negotiation to determine the order of authorship on collaborative publications. Highlights ? Researchers rated their intrinsic motivations the highest followed by their extrinsic motivations. ? Researchers who had a greater number of projects valued the deep-level characteristics of a collaborator more highly. ? Researcher who had served as a project PI or co-PI valued the deep-level characteristics of a collaborator more highly. ? Younger researchers were more concerned with a collaborator’s reputation and the cost of a collaboration decision. ? Younger researchers did not know more often whether their project teams followed any authorship rules or norms. ]]>
机译：<！[cdata [ 抽象 本研究检查了可能影响研究人员与特定研究人员合作的因素以及给予这些因素的优先事项的因素。此外，它还调查了研究人员如何确定合作项目数据的所有权以及他们如何确定在炼细物理学中的协作出版物的作者订单。一般来说，研究人员评定了其内在动机最高，例如潜在的合作者可能拥有的思想质量和与过去的合作的满意度，其次是他们的外在动机，例如合作者可以提供的互补知识，技能或资源。此外，还有更多曾担任项目PI或CO-PI的研究人员的研究人员，并重视合作师的深层，人格相关的特征高于那些没有的人。年轻的研究人员更令人厌恶，更关注合作者的声誉和合作决定的可能成本。此外，年轻的研究人员比老年研究人员更频繁地表明他们不知道他们的项目团队是否遵循任何规则或规范或从事谈判，以确定合作出版物的作者令。 亮点 ？ 研究人员评分其内在动机最高，其内在动机最高。 ？ 研究人员谁有更多的项目重视深层角色合作者的ISTICS更高度。 ？ 作为项目PI或Co-PI的研究人员更高地评估了合作者的深层特征。 ？ 年轻研究人员更加关注合作者的声誉和成本协作决定。 ？ 年轻研究人员更频繁地不了解他们的项目团队是否遵循任何作者规则或规范。 ]]>

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号