...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?
【24h】

Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?

机译：应该要求作者建议同行评审员吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As part of a continuous process to explore the factors that might weaken or corrupt traditional peer review, in this paper, we query the ethics, fairness and validity of the request, by editors, of authors to suggest peer reviewers during the submission process. One of the reasons for the current crisis in science pertains to a loss in trust as a result of a flawed peer review which is by nature biased unless it is open peer review. As we indicate, the fact that some editors and journals rely on authors' suggestions in terms of who should peer review their paper already instills a potential way to abuse the trust of the submission and publishing system. An author-suggested peer reviewer choice might also tempt authors to seek reviewers who might be more receptive or sympathetic to the authors' message or results, and thus favor the outcome of that paper. Authors should thus not be placed in such a potentially ethically compromising situation, especially as a mandatory condition for submission. However, the fact that they do not have an opt-out choice during the submission process-especially when using an online submission system that makes such a suggestion compulsory-may constitute a violation of authors' rights.
机译：作为持续流程的一部分，探讨可能削弱或腐败传统的同行评审的因素，在本文中，我们在提交过程中查询了编辑提出的编辑提出的请求的道德，公平性和有效性，以建议在提交过程中提出同行评审员。由于缺陷的同行评审，基本科学危机的原因之一就是通过自然偏见的缺陷的同行评审，除非它是开放的同行评审。正如我们所表明的那样，一些编辑和期刊依赖作者的建议，就应该对谁进行同行审查，他们的论文已经灌输了滥用提交和出版制度的信任的潜在方法。作者建议的同行评审员选择也可能诱使作者寻求可能更接受或同情作者的信息或结果的审稿人，从而有利于该论文的结果。因此，作者不应置于这种可能的道德妥协情况下，特别是提交的强制性条件。但是，他们在提交过程中没有选择选择的事实 - 特别是在使用制定这种建议的在线提交系统时 - 可能构成违反作者的权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号