...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error
【24h】

Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error

机译：做正确的事情：由于无意的错误，对仲裁的定性调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Retractions solicited by authors following the discovery of an unintentional error-what we henceforth call a "self-retraction"-are a new phenomenon of growing importance, about which very little is known. Here we present results of a small qualitative study aimed at gaining preliminary insights about circumstances, motivations and beliefs that accompanied the experience of a self-retraction. We identified retraction notes that unambiguously reported an honest error and that had been published between the years 2010 and 2015. We limited our sample to retractions with at least one co-author based in the Netherlands, Belgium, United Kingdom, Germany or a Scandinavian country, and we invited these authors to a semi-structured interview. Fourteen authors accepted our invitation. Contrary to our initial assumptions, most of our interviewees had not originally intended to retract their paper. They had contacted the journal to request a correction and the decision to retract had been made by journal editors. All interviewees reported that having to retract their own publication made them concerned for their scientific reputation and career, often causing considerable stress and anxiety. Interviewees also encountered difficulties in communicating with the journal and recalled other procedural issues that had unnecessarily slowed down the process of self-retraction. Intriguingly, however, all interviewees reported how, contrary to their own expectations, the self-retraction had brought no damage to their reputation and in some cases had actually improved it. We also examined the ethical motivations that interviewees ascribed, retrospectively, to their actions and found that such motivations included a combination of moral and prudential (i.e. pragmatic) considerations. These preliminary results suggest that scientists would welcome innovations to facilitate the process of self-retraction.
机译：在发现无意的错误之后，作者征求的撤回 - 我们从此呼唤“自我撤回” - 这是一种日益增长的新现象，这很少是已知的。在这里，我们提出了一个小型定性研究的结果，旨在获得关于伴随自我缩回经验的情况，动机和信念的初步见解。我们确定了撤退说明，明确报告了一个诚实的错误，并且在2010年和2015年之间发布了刚刚发布的。我们将样品限制在荷兰，比利时，英国，德国或斯堪的纳维亚国家或斯堪的纳维亚国家的至少一个共同作者的撤回，我们邀请了这些作者进行了半结构化的面试。十四名作者接受了我们的邀请。与我们的初步假设相反，我们的大多数受访者最初旨在撤回他们的论文。他们已联系了日志，要求更正，决定撤回杂志编辑。所有受访者都报告说，不得不收回自己的出版物使他们关心他们的科学声誉和职业生涯，往往导致相当大的压力和焦虑。受访者遇到与日志沟通的困难，并回顾了不必要地减慢了自我缩回过程的其他程序问题。然而，有趣的是，所有受访者都报告了如何与自己的期望相反，自我收回对他们的声誉没有损害，在某些情况下实际改善了它。我们还审查了受访者审批，回顾性地归于其行动的道德动机，并发现这种动机包括道德和谨慎（即务实）考虑的组合。这些初步结果表明科学家欢迎创新，以促进自我缩回的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号