...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >From Paper to Practice; Indexing Systems and Ethical Standards
【24h】

From Paper to Practice; Indexing Systems and Ethical Standards

机译：从纸张到练习; 索引系统和道德标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Currently one of the main goals of editors is to attain a higher visibility for their journals. On the other hand, authors strive to publish their research in journals indexed in eminent databases such as Scopus, Thompson Reuters' Web of Science (ISI), Medline, etc. Therefore, clarifying the standards of indexing is of great importance. One of the most important issues in publication is the ethical considerations, which are mainly described by organizations, such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and the Committee on Publication Ethics. In this study, we examined the ethical requirements of high impact databases for indexing journals to investigate whether they mention or mandate journals to adhere to publication ethics. We found that only Scopus mandated journals to state clear ethical policies on their website as a criterion for being indexed while Medline and Directory of Open Access Journals advised journals to adhere to ethics, not mandated, and Web of Science (ISI) and PubMed Central made no mention of ethics as a required criterion for indexing. Based on this short review, there seems to be a gap between the requirements of indexing systems and international guidelines for publication ethics. Currently, most indexing systems have only partially recommended journals to consider ethical issues. In such an atmosphere, we cannot expect journals or as a result, authors to professionally, completely, and whole heartedly implement ethical guidelines as a mandatory rule in their journals and research, when the indexing systems that most editors want to be indexed in and most authors want to be cited in do not mandate such guidelines.
机译：目前，编辑的主要目标之一是为他们的期刊达到更高的知名度。另一方面，作者努力在卓越的数据库中索引的期刊上发布研究，例如Scopus，汤普森路透社（ISI），Medline等，因此，澄清索引标准具有重要意义。出版物中最重要的问题之一是道德考虑因素，主要由组织，例如医学期刊编辑国际委员会和出版伦理委员会。在这项研究中，我们检查了高影响数据库的道德要求，以便索引期刊调查他们是否提及或授权遵守出版伦理的期刊。我们发现，只有SCOPUS授权期刊在其网站上发出明确的道德政策，作为索引的标准，而开放访问期刊的Medline和目录建议期刊遵守伦理，而非授权，以及科学网站（ISI）和PubMed Central没有提到伦理作为索引所需的标准。基于这一简短审查，索引系统的要求与出版伦理的国际准则之间似乎存在差距。目前，大多数索引系统只有部分推荐的期刊考虑道德问题。在这种氛围中，我们不能期待期刊或因此，当大多数编辑者想要被索引的索引系统希望被索引和大多数人都希望索引的索引系统时，我们无法预期，完全和全心全意地实施道德准则。作者希望在不授权此类指导方面被引用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号