...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Science and engineering ethics >Respecting Context to Protect Privacy: Why Meaning Matters
【24h】

Respecting Context to Protect Privacy: Why Meaning Matters

机译：尊重保护隐私的背景：为什么意味着重要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In February 2012, the Obama White House endorsed a Privacy Bill of Rights, comprising seven principles. The third, “Respect for Context,” is explained as the expectation that “companies will collect, use, and disclose personal data in ways that are consistent with the context in which consumers provide the data.” One can anticipate the contested interpretations of this principle as parties representing diverse interests vie to make theirs the authoritative one. In the paper I will discuss three possibilities and explain why each does not take us far beyond the status quo, which, regulators in the United States, Europe, and beyond have found problematic. I will argue that contextual integrity offers the best way forward for protecting privacy in a world where information increasingly mediates our significant activities and relationships. Although an important goal is to influence policy, this paper aims less to stipulate explicit rules than to present an underlying justificatory, or normative rationale. Along the way, it will review key ideas in the theory of contextual integrity, its differences from existing approaches, and its harmony with basic intuition about information sharing practices and norms.
机译：2012年2月，奥巴马白宫赞同隐私权法案，包括七项原则。第三，“尊重上下文”，作为“公司将收集，使用和披露个人数据的期望，这些方式与消费者提供数据的上下文一致。”人们可以预测对这一原则的有争议的解释，因为代表不同利益的缔约方争夺权威的缔约方。在论文中，我将讨论三种可能性，并解释为什么每个人都不远远超出现状，美国，欧洲和超越的监管机构已经发现问题。我会争辩说，背景诚信提供了保护在信息越来越多地调解我们重大活动和关系的世界中的隐私的最佳方式。虽然一个重要的目标是影响政策，但本文旨在规定明确的规则，而不是呈现潜在的正当性或规范理由。一路上，它将在语境完整性理论中审查关键思想，其与现有方法的差异，以及对信息共享实践和规范的基本直觉的和谐。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号