...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. >The SMS, Phone, and medical Examination sports injury surveillance system is a feasible and valid approach to measuring handball exposure, injury occurrence, and consequences in elite youth sport
【24h】

The SMS, Phone, and medical Examination sports injury surveillance system is a feasible and valid approach to measuring handball exposure, injury occurrence, and consequences in elite youth sport

机译：SMS，手机和体检运动伤害监测系统是一种可行和有效的方法来测量手球曝光，伤害发生以及精英青年运动中的后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Current methods of sports injury surveillance are limited by lack of medical validation of self‐reported injuries and/or incomplete information about injury consequences beyond time loss from sport. The aims of this study were to (a) evaluate the feasibility of the SMS, Phone, and medical Examination injury surveillance ( SPEx ) system (b) to evaluate the proportion of injuries and injury consequences reported by SPEx when compared to outcomes from a modified version of the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre ( OSTRC ) Overuse Injury Questionnaire. We followed 679 elite adolescent handball players over 31?weeks using the SPEx system. During the last 7?weeks, we also implemented a modified OSTRC questionnaire in a subgroup of 271 players via telephone interviews. The weekly response proportions to the primary SPEx questions ranged from 85% to 96% (mean 92%). SMS responses were received from 79% of the participants within 1?day. 95% of reported injuries were classified through the telephone interview within a week, and 67% were diagnosed by medical personnel. Comparisons between reported injuries from SPEx and OSTRC demonstrated fair (κ?=?39.5% [25.1%‐54.0%]) to substantial prevalence‐adjusted bias‐adjusted kappa ( PABAK ?=?66.8% [95% CI 58.0%‐75.6%]) agreement. The average injury severity score difference between SPEx and the OSTRC approach was ?0.2 (95% CI ?3.69‐3.29) of possible 100 with 95% limits of agreement from(?14.81‐14.41). These results support the feasibility and validity of the SPEx injury surveillance system in elite youth sport. Future studies should evaluate the external validity of SPEx system in different cohorts of athletes.
机译：目前的运动伤害监测方法受到自我报告伤害的医学验证和/或关于伤害后果的不完整信息超出了运动的影响。本研究的目的是（a）评估SMS，手机和医学检查损伤监测（SPEX）系统（B）的可行性，以评估SPEX的损伤和损伤后果的比例与修改后的结果相比奥斯陆运动创伤研究中心（OSTRC）过度使用伤害问卷的版本。我们跟踪了679个精英青少年手球运动员31岁以上31个？几周使用SPEX系统。在过去的7个星期内，我们还通过电话采访在271名玩家的子组中实施了一个修改的OSTRC问卷。主要SPEX问题的每周回复比例范围为85％至96％（平均92％）。在1？日内从79％的参与者收到短信响应。 95％的报告伤害在一周内通过电话采访分类，67％被医务人员诊断出来。 SPEX和OSTRC的报告伤害之间的比较展示了公平（κα= 39.5％[25.1％-54.0％]）至大量流行调整后的偏见调整的Kappa（Pabak？= 66.8％[95％CI 58.0％-75.6％ ]） 协议。 SPEX和OSTRC方法之间的平均伤害严重程度差异是？可能100的0.2（95％CI？3.69-3.29），来自（？14.81-14.41）的95％的协议限制。这些结果支持精英青年运动中SPEX伤害监测系统的可行性和有效性。未来的研究应评估SPEX系统在不同队列运动员的外部有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号