...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Examining the Influence of Positionality in Evaluating Collaborative Progress in Natural Resource Management: Reflections of an Academic and a Practitioner
【24h】

Examining the Influence of Positionality in Evaluating Collaborative Progress in Natural Resource Management: Reflections of an Academic and a Practitioner

机译：检查位置性能对自然资源管理协作进展的影响：学术与实习者的思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this paper, we present a reflexive examination of how and why we, an academic and a practitioner, arrive at different evaluations of collaborative progress in natural resource management. We situate this examination in our long-standing involvement in designing, adaptively managing, and participating in the Uncompahgre Plateau collaborative forest restoration project in western Colorado, USA. Drawing on the concept of positionality in qualitative social science research, we disclose our respective motivations, assumptions, roles, and power relative to the collaborative process. The differences in evaluating collaborative progress stem from our respective professional positionality. For the academic, the guiding interest was to test theory and promote success for his applied research institute; for the practitioner, the motivation was to build trust to allow her field staff the flexibility to implement management actions and demonstrate effectiveness as an agency line officer. These epistemological differences draw attention to the importance of transdisciplinary approaches to producing knowledge from shared practice, starting with efforts to explicitly disclose and honor differing interests, assumptions, and frames of reference stemming from each party's personal and professional biographies and institutional norms. This reflexivity is essential to advancing knowledge about collaboration in natural resource management.
机译：在本文中，我们对如何以及为什么我们，学术和从业者展示了如何以及为什么对自然资源管理的合作进展的不同评估。我们在我们的长期参与设计，自适应管理和参与美国西部科罗拉多州的非公开高原协作森林恢复项目方面存在这一考试。借鉴定性社会科学研究的位置概念，我们披露了相对于协作过程的各自动机，假设，角色和权力。评估协作进展的差异源于我们各自的职业定位。对于学术，指导兴趣是测试理论，促进其应用研究所的成功;对于执业者来说，动机是为了建立信任，让她的现场工作人员能够灵活地实施管理行动并展示作为一个代理行官的有效性。这些认识论差异提请注意经跨学科方法从共享实践中产生知识的重要性，从努力明确披露和荣誉各方的个人和专业传记和制度规范中的不同利益，假设和参考框架。这种反射性对于推进自然资源管理中的合作知识至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号