...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Society and Natural Resources >Governing Large CarnivoresComparative Insights from Three Different Countries
【24h】

Governing Large CarnivoresComparative Insights from Three Different Countries

机译：来自三个不同国家的大型食肉动物辅助洞察力

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The governance of large carnivores is often surrounded by conflicts. Along with the difficulties of governing large carnivores through centralized, top-down governing and a general shift towards participatory approaches in natural resource governance, this has led many countries to establish various collaborative measures in large carnivore governance - often presented as a catch-all solution to problems of legitimacy, democratic deficit and effectiveness. However, the field of large carnivore governance currently lacks a coherent understanding of strengths and weaknesses of different kinds of collaborative arrangements. In this paper, we address this knowledge gap. Using the framework of modes of governance to categorize and compare the governance of large carnivores in Norway, Sweden and Finland, we discuss the potential and limitations of various governance modes and identify gaps in contemporary research literature. The main conclusion is that all three governance systems need to incorporate more interactive governance elements.
机译：大肉生能的治理往往被冲突包围。随着通过集中化，自上而下的管理和对自然资源治理的参与式方法的一般转变来控制大肉生能的困难，这导致了许多国家在大型加剧治理中建立了各种各样的合作措施 - 通常呈现为捕捞所有解决方案对合法性，民主赤字和有效性的问题。然而，大型肉食治理领域目前缺乏对不同种类的协作安排的优势和弱点的连贯理解。在本文中，我们解决了这种知识差距。利用治理模式框架对挪威，瑞典和芬兰的大型食肉动物的治理进行分类和比较，我们讨论了各种治理模式的潜在和限制，并确定了当代研究文献中的差距。主要结论是，所有三种治理系统都需要纳入更多的互动治理元素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号