首页> 外文期刊>South African Journal of Geology: Being the Transaction of the Geological Society of South African: Syndie die Verhandelinge van die Geologiese Vereniging van Suid-Afrika >Reply to the comment made by W.U. Reimold on 'Pseudotachylite vein hosted by a clast in the Vredefort Granophyre: characterization, origin and relevance' by E. Kovaleva et al., South African Journal of Geology, 2018, 121, 51-68. doi:10.25131/sajg.121.0002
【24h】

Reply to the comment made by W.U. Reimold on 'Pseudotachylite vein hosted by a clast in the Vredefort Granophyre: characterization, origin and relevance' by E. Kovaleva et al., South African Journal of Geology, 2018, 121, 51-68. doi:10.25131/sajg.121.0002

机译:回复W.U.的评论。 通过E.Kovereva等人,南非地质学杂志,2018,121,51-68,恢复在“Vreadefort Granophyre:表征,起源和相关性的粉碎机中的假塔静脉静脉静脉曲张,起源和相关性”reimold。 DOI:10.25131 / SAJG.121.0002

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reimold (2019) attempts to discuss the issue of "geovandalism" in regards to our sampling practice. We acknowledge that indiscriminate sampling can seriously damage or even ruin classical outcrops, and many such cases have been well documented in geological literature. However, this is not a valid or reasonable criticism of our work, and furthermore, it appears that Reimold is attempting to prevent other researchers from sampling in Vredefort, while he and his co-authors are apparently not hesitant when taking samples for their own studies (Figure 1).
机译:Reimold(2019)试图讨论对我们的抽样实践的“地理群教”问题。 我们承认,不分青红皂白的抽样可能会严重损害甚至破坏古典露营,许多这种情况在地质文学中有很好的记录。 然而,这不是对我们工作的有效或合理的批评,而且,似乎重新兑换正在试图防止其他研究人员在Vredfort中取样,而他和他的共同作者在为自己的研究中采取样品时显然并不犹豫不决 (图1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号