首页> 外文期刊>Studies in the History of Gardens & Designed Landscapes >Using proximate real estate to fund England's nineteenth century pioneeringurban parks: viable vehicle or mendacious myth?
【24h】

Using proximate real estate to fund England's nineteenth century pioneeringurban parks: viable vehicle or mendacious myth?

机译:使用邻近房地产来基于英格兰十九世纪的先锋水道:可行的车辆或翼状胬肉神话?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It could reasonably be posited that large public urban parks are one of England's best ideas and one of its most widely adopted cultural exports. They were first conceived, nurtured and implemented in England. From there they spread to the other UK countries, to the USA, to Commonwealth nations, and beyond. Initially, they emerged as speculative real estate developments in which proximate property owners received exclusive access to the park for an annual fee, so they were not public parks. However,over time exclusivity was eroded and finally removed; they were acquired, or rescued from financial failure, by town councils; and their upkeep and renovation became the responsibility of public taxpayers.
机译:它可以合理地受到大型公共城市公园是英格兰最好的想法之一,其最广泛采用的文化出口之一。 他们首先在英格兰进行了培育和实施。 从那里蔓延到其他英国国家,向美国,英联邦国家,超越。 最初,他们出现为投机性房地产开发,其中邻近财产主人收到年费的独家机会,所以他们不是公共公园。 然而,随着时间的推移排他性被侵蚀并最终被删除; 他们被镇议会获得或从金融失败中获取或救出; 他们的保养和改造成为公共纳税人的责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号