...
首页> 外文期刊>Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer >Effectiveness of intervention with a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy
【24h】

Effectiveness of intervention with a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy

机译:围手术期多学科支持团队进行干预的有效性,用于根治式食管切除术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intervention by a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 85 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who underwent radical esophagectomy via right thoracotomy or thoracoscopic surgery with gastric tube reconstruction. Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the non-intervention group (group N) from May 2011 to September 2012, 31 patients in the perioperative rehabilitation group (group R) from October 2012 to April 2014, and 33 patients in the multidisciplinary support team group (group S) from May 2014 to September 2015. Results Morbidity rates were 38, 45.2, and 42.4% for groups N, R, and S, respectively. Although there were no significant differences in the incidence of pneumonia among the groups, the durations of fever and C-reactive protein positivity were shorter in group S. Moreover, postoperative oral intake commenced earlier [5.9 (5–8)?days] and postoperative hospital stay was shorter [19.6 (13–29)?days] for group S. Conclusions The intervention by a perioperative multidisciplinary support team for radical esophagectomy was effective in preventing the progression and prolongation of pneumonia as well as earlier ambulation, oral feeding, and shortening of postoperative hospitalization.
机译:摘要目的,我们旨在评估围手术期多学科支持团队对食管癌根治性食道切除术的干预的有效性。方法我们回顾性地审查了85例连续的食管癌患者,通过右胸术或胸腔镜手术与胃管重建接受自由基食管切除术。从2011年5月至2012年5月至2012年5月,从2011年5月到2012年9月,从2012年5月至2012年9月,从2012年10月到2014年10月,31名患者,以及33名患者在2014年4月,以及33名患者中的多学科支持团队集团(集团)从2014年5月至2015年9月。结果分别为38,45.2和S的45.2和42.4%。虽然群体中肺炎发生率没有显着差异,但在S术后,发烧和C反应性蛋白阳性的持续时间较短,术后口服进入早期[5.9(5-8)?天]和术后SECHEAS STAY的入住时间较短术后住院治疗缩短。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号