• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>PACE: Pacing and clinical electrophysiology >Acute outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation: Comparison between Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance PRO
【24h】

Acute outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation: Comparison between Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance PRO

机译：单一冷冻消融后的急性结果：北极前进和北极前进的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Background The novel fourth‐generation cryoballoon (CB4) potentially allows for enhanced catheter maneuverability and more frequent capture of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials which can be used to monitor real‐time PV isolation (PVI). The aim of our study is to compare the acute procedural endpoints between the CB4 and second‐generation cryoballoon (CB2). Methods A single‐center retrospective chart review was used to examine 50 consecutive patients with drug‐refractory atrial fibrillation undergoing CB4‐based PVI. Procedural data and acute success of these patients were compared to 50 propensity‐matched controls who underwent cryoballoon ablation procedure using CB2. Results Procedures performed with the CB4 showed significant shorter fluoroscopy time (14.8?± 5.5?vs 18.0 ± 6.5?minutes, P ?=?.04), shorter procedure time (58.3 ± 15.7?vs 65.3 ± 21?minutes, P ?=?.13), and shorter total ablation time (10.8 ± 1.5?vs 13.8 ± 1.9?minutes, P ?=?.42). The real‐time PVI visualization rate was 33.3% in the CB2 group and 74.7% in the CB4 group ( P ??.001). CB4 was correlated to significant increase of acute real‐time recordings with regard to all the single PV (left superior PV: 58%?vs 84%, P ?=?.02; left inferior PV: 26%?vs 71%, P ?=?.001; right superior PV 29%?vs 61%, P ?=?.01; and right inferior PV 19%?vs 58%, P ?=?.002). Conclusion The CB4 was more often able to capture real‐time recordings of PV potentials and the subsequent acute PV isolation.
机译：摘要背景新的第四代低温（CB4）可能允许增强的导管机动性和更频繁地捕获可用于监测实时光伏隔离（PVI）的肺静脉（PV）电位。我们的研究目的是比较CB4和第二代龙骨（CB2）之间的急性程序终点。方法采用单中心回顾性图表审查来检查50名患有Cb4的PVI的药物难治性心房颤动的50名患者。将这些患者的程序数据和急性成功与50个使用CB2接受过冷冻消融程序的50个倾向匹配的对照。结果用CB4进行的程序显示出显着的较短透视时间（14.8？±5.5？与18.0±6.5？分钟，p？= 04），较短的程序时间（58.3±15.7？与65.3±21？分钟，p？= ？.13），并且总消融时间缩短（10.8±1.5？与13.8±1.9？分钟，p？= 42）。 CB2基团的实时PVI可视化率为33.3％，CB4组中的74.7％（P？＆ 001）。 CB4与所有单级PV（左上方PV：58％左右）相关的急性实时记录的显着增加与急性实时录音相关联？= 001;右上方PV 29％？与61％，p？= 01;右下PV 19％？与58％，p？= 002）。结论CB4更常常能够捕获PV电位的实时记录和随后的急性PV分离。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号