• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Perspectives on Psychological Science >Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting
【24h】

Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting

机译：使研究评估更加透明：对齐研究哲学，机构价值观和报告

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

There is a growing interest in changing the culture of psychology to improve the quality of our science. At the root of this interest is concern over the reproducibility of key findings. A variety of large-scale replication attempts have revealed that several previously published effects cannot be reproduced, whereas other analyses indicate that the published literature is rife with underpowered studies and publication bias. These revelations suggest that it is time to change how psychological science is carried out and increase the transparency of reporting. We argue that change will be slow until institutions adopt new procedures for evaluating scholarly activity. We consider three actions that individuals and departments can take to facilitate change throughout psychological science: the development of individualized research-philosophy statements, the creation of an annotated curriculum vitae to improve the transparency of scholarly reporting, and the use of a formal evaluative system that explicitly captures behaviors that support reproducibility. Our recommendations build on proposals for open science by enabling researchers to have a voice in articulating (and contextualizing) how they would like their work to be evaluated and by providing a mechanism for more detailed and transparent reporting of scholarly activities.
机译：越来越兴趣改变心理学文化，以提高我们科学的质量。在这种兴趣的根本上是关注关键结果的再现性。各种大规模的复制尝试揭示了几种先前公布的效果，而其他分析表明，公布的文献是具有动力的研究和出版物偏见。这些揭示表明，是时候改变了心理科学的开展方式，增加了报告的透明度。在机构采用评估学术活动的新程序之前，我们认为改变将会缓慢。我们认为，个人和部门可以采取三项行动，以促进整个心理科学的变化：个性化研究哲学陈述的发展，创建一个注释的课程简体力，以提高学术报告的透明度，以及使用正式的评估系统明确捕获支持再现性的行为。我们的建议通过使研究人员在阐明（和上下文化）中具有语音来支持开放科学的建议，他们希望如何评估他们的工作，并通过为学术活动提供更详细和透明的报告来提供机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号