【24h】

The cultural evolutionary trade-off of ritualistic synchrony

机译:仪式同步的文化进化权衡

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

From Australia to the Arctic, human groups engage in synchronous behaviour during communal rituals. Because ritualistic synchrony is widespread, many argue that it is functional for human groups, encouraging large-scale cooperation and group cohesion. Here, we offer a more nuanced perspective on synchrony's function. We review research on synchrony's prosocial effects, but also discuss synchrony's antisocial effects such as encouraging group conflict, decreasing group creativity and increasing harmful obedience. We further argue that a tightness-looseness (TL) framework helps to explain this trade-off and generates new predictions for how ritualistic synchrony should evolve over time, where it should be most prevalent, and how it should affect group well-being. We close by arguing that synthesizing the literature on TL with the literature on synchrony has promise for understanding synchrony's role in a broader cultural evolutionary framework. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ritual renaissance: new insights into the most human of behaviours'.
机译:从澳大利亚到北极,人群在公共仪式期间从事同步行为。由于仪式的同步普遍存在,因此许多人认为这是人类群体的功能,鼓励大规模合作和团体凝聚力。在这里,我们提供了一个更细微的同步功能的观点。我们审查了同步的女性化效应的研究,还讨论了同步的反社会效应,如鼓励群体冲突,减少群体创造力和增加有害服从。我们进一步争辩说,紧张 - 松散(TL)框架有助于解释这种权衡,并为仪式同步应随着时间的推移而发展的新预测,应该是最普遍的,以及如何影响集团福祉。我们通过争辩说,通过对同步的文献综合TL的文献,承诺了解同步在更广泛的文化进化框架中的作用。本文是主题问题“仪式文艺复兴”的一部分:新见解进入最人类的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号