...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data.
【24h】

Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data.

机译：编码错误：医院和预期收集的部门数据的比较分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of a hospital coding database at a busy tertiary referral urological unit. METHODS: Prospectively collected departmental coding data for all urological patients attending the Churchill Hospital, Oxford between 1 May 1999 and 30 April 2000 were compared with the coding data entered by hospital coding clerks on the Oxford Radcliffe NHS Trust database. RESULTS: There were significant discrepancies between the number of patients on the hospital and the departmental database (639 vs 1109). There were gross procedural coding errors in 74 cases. CONCLUSION: Hospital-coded data in this study were incomplete and inaccurate. This has important implications when considering the validity of hospital-trust databases when used as a source for medical research, clinical audit and as a representation of a consultants' clinical workload.
机译：目的：评估在繁忙的三级转诊泌尿科的医院编码数据库的准确性。方法：将1999年5月1日至2000年4月30日在牛津丘吉尔医院就诊的所有泌尿科泌尿科患者的前瞻性部门编码数据与医院编码职员在Oxford Radcliffe NHS Trust数据库中输入的编码数据进行比较。结果：医院和部门数据库的患者人数之间存在显着差异（639比1109）。 74例存在严重的程序编码错误。结论：本研究中医院编码的数据不完整且不准确。当考虑将医院信任数据库用作医学研究，临床审计和顾问的临床工作量的来源时，这具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号