...
首页> 外文期刊>Physiotherapy research international: the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy >Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer
【24h】

Measuring pressure pain threshold in the cervical region of dizzy patients—The reliability of a pressure algometer

机译:眩晕患者宫颈区域测量压力疼痛阈值 - 压力距离距离的可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Abstract Objectives A tool for measuring neck pain in patients with dizziness is needed to further investigate the relationship between the two symptoms. The objective of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of a hand‐held pressure algometer in measuring pressure pain threshold (PPT) in different cervical regions of dizzy patients. Methods PPT was measured at two bilateral standardized sites of the neck by a trained physiotherapist in 50 patients with dizziness. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intrarater and test–retest reliability. Concurrent validity was assessed by measuring the association between PPT and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) tender points at each site and with the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). Results Almost perfect intrarater (ICC?=?0.815–0.940) and within‐session test–retest (ICC?=?0.854–0.906) reliability was found between the measures. On each site, a low PPT predicted a positive ACR tender point at each site (OR?=?0.864–0.922). Last, we found a statistical inverse relationship between the PPT and the NPRS ( R ?=??0.52 to ?0.66). Conclusion The study shows that a pressure algometer is a reliable tool for measuring PPT in the neck of dizzy patients. Further, the PPT correlates significantly with other subjective measures of pain indicating that it may be a useful tool for further research.
机译:摘要目的需要一种用于测量头晕患者颈部疼痛的工具,以进一步调查两种症状之间的关系。本研究的目的是研究手持式压力距离测量患者不同宫颈区域的压力疼痛阈值(PPT)的可靠性和有效性。方法PPT在颈部两侧双侧标准化部位测量,训练有素的物理治疗师在50例头晕患者中。计算腹部相关系数(ICC)以进行内部和测试 - 保持性可靠性。通过衡量每个网站的PPT与美国风湿病学院(ACR)招标点之间的关联和数值止吐值(NPRS)来评估并发有效性。结果几乎完美的Intrarenter(ICC?=?0.815-0.940)和会议内测试 - 重新测试(ICC?= 0.854-0.906)在措施之间发现可靠性。在每个网站上,低PPT预测每个部位的阳性射点(或?= 0.864-0.922)。最后,我们发现PPT和NPR之间的统计反相(R?= ?? 0.52至0.66)。结论该研究表明,压力距离是一种可靠的患者颈部PPT的可靠工具。此外,PPT与其他主观疼痛措施显着相关,表明它可能是进一步研究的有用工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号