• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Prevention science: the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research >Implementing Intervention Research into Public Policy—the “I 3 -Approach”
【24h】

Implementing Intervention Research into Public Policy—the “I 3 -Approach”

机译：将干预研究实施进入公共政策 - “我3-Propach”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Abstract Evidence-based intervention programs have become highly important in recent years, especially in educational contexts. However, transferring these programs into practice and into the wider field of public policy often fails. As a consequence, the field of implementation research has emerged, several implementation frameworks have been developed, and implementation studies conducted. However, intervention research and implementation research have not yet been connected systematically and different traditions and research groups are involved. Implementation researchers are mostly given mandates by politicians to take on the implementation of already existing interventions. This might be one of the key reasons why there are still many problems in translating programs into widespread community practice. In this paper, we argue for a systematic integration of intervention and implementation research (“I_(3)-Approach”) and recommend a six-step procedure (PASCIT). This requires researchers to design and develop intervention programs using a field-oriented and participative approach. In particular, the perspective of policymakers has to be included as well as an analysis of which factors support or hinder evidence-based policy in contrast to opinion-based policy. How this systematic connection between intervention and implementation research can be realized, is illustrated by means of the development and implementation of the ViSC school program, which intends to reduce aggressive behavior and bullying and to foster social and intercultural competencies.
机译：近年来，摘要基于证据的干预计划在教育背景下变得非常重要。但是，将这些方案转移到实践中并进入更广泛的公共政策领域经常失败。因此，已经开发了几个实施框架的实施研究领域，并进行了实施研究。然而，干预研究和实施研究尚未系统地联系，不同的传统和研究组。实施研究人员主要由政治家授权，以承担已经存在的干预措施的实施。这可能是为什么将程序转化为广泛的社区惯例时仍存在许多问题的主要原因之一。在本文中，我们争论干预和实施研究的系统整合（“I_（3） - Propach”）并推荐六步程序（PASCIT）。这需要研究人员使用面向领域和参与的方法来设计和开发干预计划。特别是，必须包括政策制定者的视角，并与基于意见的政策相比，分析了哪些因素支持或妨碍基于证据的政策。如何实现干预和实施研究之间的系统联系，通过缺席学校计划的开发和实施来说明，这意味着减少积极的行为和欺凌，并促进社会和跨文化能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号