...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological assessment >Mindfulness Is Positively Related to Socioeconomic Job Status and Income and Independently Predicts Mental Distress in a Long-Term Perspective: Danish Validation Studies of the Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire
【24h】

Mindfulness Is Positively Related to Socioeconomic Job Status and Income and Independently Predicts Mental Distress in a Long-Term Perspective: Danish Validation Studies of the Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire

机译:心灵与社会经济工作地位和收入正相关,并在长期的视角下独立预测精神上的痛苦:丹麦验证研究五因素迈出问卷

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Five Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) measures 5 factor-analytically derived mindfulness aspects (Observe, Describe, Non-Judgment, Non-Reactivity, and Acting with Awareness) and is commonly used as an indicator of mindfulness in population surveys and studies of mindfulness-based interventions (MBI). Outside MBI, FFMQ scores are hypothesized to reflect relatively stable human dispositions of importance to psychological health. However, the long-term test-retest reliability of FFMQ scores is virtually untested and it remains unknown whether FFMQ scores predict psychological health after controlling for standardized socioeconomic status classifications. First, we focused on psychometric validation of the FFMQ translated to Danish in a randomly invited healthy and nonmeditating adult community sample (N = 490). Confirmatory factor analyses primarily supported a four-factor construct excluding the Observe facet. The four-factor model showed adequate composite reliability, convergent validity and satisfactory-excellent internal consistency, Cronbach alpha s = .72-.91. Structural equationmodeling revealed that FFMQ Total scores were positively related to income and socioeconomic status but independently predicted psychological distress and mental health scores, respectively, after controlling for age, gender, body mass index, socioeconomic job classification, stressful life events, and social desirability, beta = -.24-.29, ps .001. Second, FFMQ scores showed adequate short-term (two weeks) test-retest reliability among 99 healthy university students, Spearman's ps = .82. Finally, all FFMQ mean scores showed satisfactory test-retest reliability across a long-term (six months) interval (N = 407), intraclass correlation coefficients = .74. We recommend the Danish FFMQ for further use. The Observe facet should be interpreted with caution. Remaining FFMQ facet scores comprise an internally consistent four-dimensional construct reflecting long-term-reliable human dispositions of independent significance for predicting mental health.
机译:五个因素致力于调查问卷(FFMQ)衡量5个因素分析派对方面(观察,描述,非判断,非反应性和充满感知行动),并且通常用作人口调查和心灵研究的一项令人思想的指标基于干预措施(MBI)。在MBI之外,FFMQ分数被假设,以反映对心理健康的重要性的相对稳定的人类处置。然而,FFMQ分数的长期测试 - 保持可靠性几乎不确定,并且仍然未知FFMQ分数是否预测控制标准化的社会经济地位分类后的心理健康。首先,我们专注于在随机邀请的健康和非修正成年社区样本(n = 490)中转化为丹麦语的FFMQ的心理测量验证。确认因子分析主要支持四因素构建体,除了观察方面。四因素模型显示了足够的复合可靠性,收敛有效性和令人满意的内部一致性,Cronbach alpha s = .72-.91。结构方程式表明,FFMQ总分数与收入和社会经济状况肯定相关,但分别预测了心理困扰和心理健康成绩,在控制年龄,性别,体重指数,社会经济工作分类,压力生活事件和社会可取性, Beta = -24-.29,ps& .001。其次,FFMQ分数显示出足够的短期(两周)测试 - 在99名健康大学生,Spearman的PS≫ = .82。最后,所有FFMQ平均分得分在长期(六个月)间隔(n = 407)中显示出令人满意的测试 - 保持可靠性(n = 407),intraclass相关系数& = .74。我们推荐丹麦FFMQ进一步使用。观察方面应谨慎解释。剩余的FFMQ方面评分包括内部一致的四维构建体,反映了对预测心理健康的独立意义的长期可靠的人类处置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号