...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative health research >Best Practice Principles When Working With Individuals With Intellectual Disability and Comorbid Mental Health Concerns
【24h】

Best Practice Principles When Working With Individuals With Intellectual Disability and Comorbid Mental Health Concerns

机译：与知识分子残疾和合并心理健康有关的人士合作时最佳实践原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Working with individuals with dual disabilities can be a complex process in the presence of limited evidence base to guide clinical practice. The aims of this qualitative study were to investigate perceptions of best practices of Australian psychologists who work with this specialist population. Thirty-eight Australian psychologists working in the intellectual disability field participated in eight semistructured focus groups. Perceptions of evidence-based practice for individuals with intellectual disabilities and in relation to mental health assessment were explored. Psychologists demonstrated resourcefulness in adapting to limits in available evidence-based practice and in modifying mainstream practice to suit the needs of individuals with dual disabilities. Findings suggest the necessity of practice-based evidence in contributing to the evidence base, and person-centered approaches in relation to best practice for people with intellectual disabilities. Implications for strengthening psychologists’ clinical competency and bridging the research and practice gap are discussed.
机译：与双重残疾人合作可以在存在有限的证据基础上是一个复杂的过程，以指导临床实践。这种定性研究的目的是调查与本专家人口合作的澳大利亚心理学家最佳做法的看法。在智力残疾领域工作的三十八家澳大利亚心理学家参与了八个半系统焦点小组。探讨了对具有智力障碍和与心理健康评估有关的个人对基于证据的看法的看法。心理学家在适应可用证据的实践中并在修改主流实践中，展示了智慧的灵活性，以满足双重残疾人的需求。调查结果表明，基于实践的证据的必要性为有助于证据基础，以及与智障人士的最佳实践相关的人为中心的方法。讨论了加强心理学家临床能力和桥接研究和实践差距的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号