...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Publishing research quarterly >Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure
【24h】

Open Access Mega-Journals: Quality, Economics and Post-publication Peer Review Infrastructure

机译：开放式访问Mega-journals：质量，经济学和出版后的同行评审基础设施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As the publishing industry evolves towards the predominant open access (OA) model, publishers are establishing OA journal power-houses, the OA mega-journals (OAMJs), which are wide in scope, with larger-than-usual editor boards, and that pump out large numbers of papers. OAMJs are thus able to accommodate a surge in submissions, or transfers from other journals within the same publisher's fleet. OAMJs represent a simple but effective publishing model that can also be an effective business model. We question whether the peer review system is robust enough to accommodate for effective post-publication peer review in OAMJs. As examples, we examine Scientific Reports, PLOS One, Heliyon, F1000Research, PeerJ, and BMJ Open, as well as a possible developing OAMJ, eLife, for clues to the dynamics of OAMJs and the possible links to quality control via peer review or post-publication peer review. We also take a closer look at the economics of OA publishing that might be driving the expansion of the OAMJ market.
机译：随着出版业发展的主要开放式访问（OA）模型，出版商正在建立OA期刊电力房屋，OA Mega-Gromnals（OAMJS），其范围广泛，具有较大的编辑板，以及抽出大量纸张。因此，OAMJS能够适应提交的兴奋，或者从同一出版商车队中的其他期刊转移。 OAMJS代表一个简单但有效的发布模型，也可以是一个有效的商业模式。我们质疑同行评审系统是否足够强大，以适应OAMJS的有效发布后对等审查。作为示例，我们研究科学报告，PLO一，Heliyon，F1000Research，PEERJ和BMJ开放，以及通过同行评审或邮寄的OAMJS动态的线索和可能的链接的可能的开发OAMJ，Elife - 公开同行评审。我们还仔细研究了OA出版的经济学，可能正在推动OAMJ市场的扩张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号