...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Quality in ageing and older adults. >All the lonely people, where do they all belong? An interpretive synthesis of loneliness and social support in older lesbian, gay and bisexual communities
【24h】

All the lonely people, where do they all belong? An interpretive synthesis of loneliness and social support in older lesbian, gay and bisexual communities

机译：所有孤独的人，他们都属于哪里？ 女同性恋，同性恋和双性恋社区中孤独和社会支持的解释综合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - Loneliness is a phenomenon which affects people globally and constitutes a key social issue of our time. Yet few studies have considered the nature of loneliness and social support for older lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) people; this is of particular concern as they are among the social groups said to be at greater risk. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach - Peer-reviewed literature was identified through a search of Scopus, PsyclNFO and PubMed. A total of 2,277 papers were retrieved including qualitative and quantitative studies which were quality assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings - In total, 11 papers were included in the review and findings were synthesised using thematic analysis. The studies were conducted in five countries worldwide with a combined sample size of 53,332 participants, of whom 4,288 were drawn from among LGB communities. The characteristics and circumstances associated with loneliness including living arrangements, housing tenure, minority stress and geographical proximity. Research limitations/implications - The review suggests that among older LGB people, living alone, not being partnered and being childfree may increase the risk of loneliness. This cohort of older people may experience greater difficulties in building relationships of trust and openness. They may also have relied on sources of identity-based social support that are in steep decline. Future research should include implementation studies to evaluate effective strategies in reducing loneliness among older LGB people. Practical implications - Reaching older LGB people who are vulnerable due to physical mobility or rural isolation and loneliness because of bereavement or being a carer is a concern. A range of interventions including individual (befriending), group-based (for social contact) in addition to potential benefits from the Internet of Things should be evaluated. Discussions with the VCS suggest that take up of existing provision is 85:15 GB men vs LB women. Social implications - Formal social support structures which were provided by voluntary sector agencies have been disproportionately affected by recent austerity measures. Originality/value - The authors sought to interrogate the tension between findings of lower levels of social support and discourses of resilient care offered by families of choice.
机译：目的 - 孤独是一种影响全球人民的现象，并构成了我们时代的关键社会问题。然而，很少有研究已经考虑了孤独和社会支持的性质，对女同性恋，同性恋和双性恋（LGB）人民;这是特别关注的是，他们是社会群体的据说是更大的风险。本文旨在讨论这个问题。设计/方法/方法 - 通过搜索Scopus，Psyclnfo和Pubmed来确定对等审查文献。还检索了2,277篇论文，包括使用关键评估技能计划评估的质量和定量研究。调查结果 - 总共包括11篇论文审查，并使用主题分析合成了调查结果。该研究在全球五个国家进行，综合样品大小为53,332名参与者，其中LGB社区中占据了4,288人。与寂寞有关的特点和情况，包括生活安排，住房任期，少数民族压力和地理位置。研究限制/含义 - 审查表明，在较旧的LGB人中，独自生活，没有被伙伴和儿童免于儿童可能会增加孤独的风险。这种老年人的队列可能在建立信任和开放关系方面遇到更大的困难。他们也可能依赖于基于身份的社会支持来源，这是陡峭的下降。未来的研究应包括实施研究，以评估减少老年LGB人群中孤独的有效策略。实际意义 - 达到较旧的LGB人们因物理流动性或农村孤立和孤独而受到丧亲或照顾者是一个关注的问题。除了来自互联网上的潜在福利之外，还应评估包括个人（与交友），基于组（社交联系）的干预措施的一系列干预措施。与VCS的讨论表明，现有规定是85:15 GB Men vs LB妇女。社会影响 - 自愿部门机构提供的正式社会支持结构已被最近的紧缩措施的影响不成比例地影响。原创性/价值 - 作者试图询问选择较低的社会支持和选择性的弹性护理措施的调查结果之间的紧张关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号