...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >Where to for Australian mental health services? Promoting self-efficacy.
【24h】

Where to for Australian mental health services? Promoting self-efficacy.

机译：澳大利亚心理健康服务在哪里？ 促进自我效能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I have deliberately interpreted the remit of this essay narrowly, choosing not to be diverted by current turf wars between biologically and psycho-socially minded mental health professionals and debates about how little or how much biological advances have helped or hindered the care of individuals with mental illness (Bracken et al., 2012; Bullmore et al., 2009; Insel and Quirion, 2005; Kingdon and Young, 2007). Suffice to say that our biological treatments remain very helpful for some patients but much less helpful for many others, both in terms of efficacy and side effects. On the other hand, psychosocial care is very difficult to deliver to individuals who are too unwell, psychotic, disorganised and distressed by their symptoms. So, we obviously need to take the best mix of biological and psycho-social interventions and customise them in a coherent manner for the individual patient. We also need to have patients and carers explicitly involved in the planning and delivery of this package of care. And this needs the 'system' to enable a seamless mul-tifaceted service encompassing all need areas (clinical, family, work, and so forth).
机译：我故意勉强地解释了这篇文章的汇款，选择不被生物和心理学 - 社会思想的心理健康专业人士之间的当前草坪战争转移，以及关于多么努力或者生物学进展有关或者有多少生物进步有助于或阻碍了患有精神上的个人的辩论疾病（Bracken等，2012年; Bullmore等，2009; Insel和Quirion，2005; Kingdon和Young，2007）。足以说我们的生物治疗对某些患者仍然非常有帮助，但在疗效和副作用方面，对许多其他患者尤利。另一方面，心理社会护理非常困难送给过于不适，精神病，被症状的症状。因此，我们显然需要采取最佳的生物和心理社会干预措施，并以连贯的方式为个体患者定制它们。我们还需要有明确参与这一包裹的规划和交付的患者和护理人员。这需要“系统”，以使无缝的MUL过度服务能够拥有所有需要领域（临床，家庭，工作等）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号