...
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry >The ADHD debate: To bury national guidelines or to praise them?
【24h】

The ADHD debate: To bury national guidelines or to praise them?

机译:ADHD辩论:埋葬国家指导方针或赞美他们吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mr Whitely expands on his Viewpoint (Whitely, 2012) on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) management, especially related to issues associated with stimulant medication prescribing in Western Australia. His views could best be considered as coming from a community perspective rather than having a clinical or research underpinning. Hence, it is not surprising to see a broader range of references: newspaper articles and his own website. And also a broader range of declaration of interests: Scientology financial support.I await with interest further com-munity-sourced Viewpoint articles on topics other than ADHD, and I am sure there will be no shortage of interested parties keen to access the ANZJP readership. Now to his concerns in this edition.His original arguments about the overprescribing of stimulants and their safety were adequately reviewed - and rebutted where necessary (Levy, 2012, 2013; Paterson, 2013; Starling, 2013). I thought that matter had come to an end and am disappointed to see that Mr Whitely has once again submitted strong anti-ADHD views which have little evidential backing. For example, he again argues that there was a 'massive decline' of stimulant prescribing between 2002 and 2010, referring to a level of 50% which seems to have been produced by doing his own adjusting 'for confounding factors', the nature of which are not made clear.
机译:关于注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)管理,MR Whitely扩大了他的观点(此,2012年),特别是与西澳大利亚西澳大利亚州的兴奋药物有关的问题。他的观点最好被视为来自社区的角度而不是临床或研究缺乏。因此,看到更广泛的参考资料和他自己的网站并不令人惊讶。还有更广泛的兴趣宣言:科学财政支持。我同行进一步的兴趣来自adhd以外的主题的兴趣观点的文章,我相信有兴趣的缔约方仍然没有缺乏访问ANZJP读者。现在,他在这个版本中的担忧。关于兴奋剂的过度认调的原始论据是充分审查 - 在必要时得到了审查和反驳(Levy,2012,2013; Paterson,2013; Starling,2013)。我以为要结束,我很失望,看到先生同时再次提交强大的反诉观点,这几乎没有证据支持。例如,他再次辩称,2002年和2010年之间存在兴奋剂处方的“大规模下降”,提到了50%的水平,似乎是通过自己调整“对混杂因素”来制作的50%,其性质没有明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号